Archive for June, 2015
One of the most frequent questions our office gets since and even before May 26, 2015 when the H-4 Spouse EAD filing window opened has been, “How long would it take to get the H-4 Spouse EAD approved?” Because the H-4 Spouse EAD is a brand new program and especially due to the really high anticipated volume of H-4 Spouse EAD applications, we have not been able to provide a firm answer. USCIS had indicated that their goal would be to issue EAD approvals within 90 days of filing. But as our office is starting to receive H-4 Spouse EAD approvals and notifications of approvals, we are starting to get at least some preliminary idea of the processing times. Read moreNo comments
Our office closely monitors not only each monthly Visa Bulletin but also any developments and updates from here in Washington, DC which may give us some idea on upcoming movements and surprises. Our goal is to share any and all credible information with our clients and readers in order to allow proper planning and to set expectations as realistically as possible.
Mr. Charles Oppenheim, who is the Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division at the U.S. Department of State and the person who prepares and publishes the monthly visa bulletin, has provided some thoughts and his expectations for the upcoming few months’ Visa Bulletin movements. These comments are as of June 12, 2015.
EB-2 Worldwide (ROW)
Mr. Oppenheim reiterated that there has been a significant increase in the demand of visa numbers in this category with demand far in excess of the historical patterns of the previous five months. As an example, Mr. Oppenheim indicated that there was 80% demand increase from February to March 2015 and demand increased more than 100% between February and April 2015. Despite this significant increase in demand in EB-2 ROW visa numbers, it is not expected at this time that there will be a cutoff date for this category and it is likely to remain current.
As a result of the significant forward movement in EB-2 India earlier this year, additional forward movement for the next few months is unlikely mainly due to EB-3 to EB-2 upgrades. Additionally, because demand for EB-2 ROW has more than doubled unexpectedly over the past few months, EB-2 India cut-off date had to be held steady in the July 2015 Visa Bulletin. Unless there is a significant decline in EB-2 ROW demand, Mr. Oppenheim does not anticipate any forward movement in EB-2 India for the rest of this fiscal year (September 30).
EB-3 India is expected to continue to advance by one to two weeks per month. This has been the recent trend over the past several months.
Demand in EB-2 China has been steady and gradual forward movement is expected over the next several months. The EB-3 China cut-off date is expected to remain the same through the rest of the fiscal year (September 30).
EB-5 China is expected to continue to advance,very likely as far as November 2013 towards the end of the fiscal year.
EB-3/Other Workers Philippines
After the category became unavailable in the July 2015 Visa Bulletin, it is expected to remain unavailable for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Mr. Oppenheim’s comments are extremely helpful to get a sense of the visa cutoff dates over the next few months. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can review your case, answer any questions or schedule a consultation.
We also invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics. Finally, if you already haven’t, please consider our Visa Bulletin Predictions tool which provides personalized predictions and charts helping you understand when a particular priority date may become current and what are the movement patterns.No comments
Our office handles a substantial number of ETA Form 9089 – Permanent Labor Certification (“PERM”) applications and we are closely monitoring the current PERM processing times not only for the benefit of our clients but also to be able to predict longer-term trends in PERM processing.
The Department of Labor (“DOL”) has provided an update on the current PERM filing and processing statistics in addition to the processing dates as of June 1, 2015.
Current PERM Processing Times
The processing times report by DOL for this month suggests slight increase in the PERM processing times compared to the last couple of months. Regular PERM cases should take around seven months.
The processing times, as reported by DOL, are as follows:
- Regular processing: November 2014. DOL is processing PERM applications with priority dates of November 2014. This report suggests that there is a slowdown in the processing times for regular PERM cases. Accordingly, regular PERM processing times should be around seven months. Our office has experienced PERM approvals consistent with this timeline and we can confirm it. The PERM processing times have increased over the last few months – from around five to seven months — we hope that DOL will be able to change this trend and decrease their regular PERM processing times over the next months.
- Audited applications: December 2013. DOL is processing PERM audits which have a priority date (date of filing of the PERM application) of December 2013. This processing times report has remained more or less consistent over the last few months. Accordingly, audited PERM applications are processed approximately 18 months after the initial PERM was filed and the priority date established.
- Appealed applications (requests for reconsideration to the Certifying Officer): April 2015. DOL is processing PERM appeals (requests for reconsideration to the certifying officer) which were appealed in April 2015. There is an increase in this metric – only a few months ago it used to take 30-45 days to hear from the Certifying Officer. Now, it may take 2 to 3 months to hear from the Certifying Officer after a PERM case is denied and a request for appeal is sent to the Certifying Officer.
- “Government error” appealed applications. DOL has indicated that PERM appeals in this category are reviewed on a 30-45 day timeline. However, after filing an appeal, DOL does not make an indication whether a PERM appeal is accepted to be processed under the “government error” queue or under the regular appeal queue. As a result, DOL has indicated that the only way to know whether a PERM appeal has been accepted for processing under the “government error” queue is to wait for 45 days for response. If the PERM appeal is reviewed within this time, this would be an indication that a PERM appeal has been accepted (and reviewed) under the “government error” queue. If no response is received 45 days after filing of a PERM appeal, then this should be an indication that the PERM is pending under the regular appeals queue.
The June 2015 PERM processing times report shows that the PERM processing times are increasing over the last couple of months. We had noticed gradual increase in the PERM processing times earlier in the year and it appears that this trend of gradual increase in the processing times continues. We are hopeful that DOL will be able to work on reversing this trend and start bringing the PERM processing times down over the next months.
Our office has developed a great practice handling PERM filings and/or audit/appeal responses so please do not hesitate to contact us if we can help you. Also, we will continue monitoring the PERM processing times and analyze any updates. Please visit us again or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to ensure that you obtain this and related immigration-related news and announcements.
The U.S. State Department has just released the July 2015 Visa Bulletin which is the tenth Visa Bulletin for the FY2015 fiscal year. The major headline in the upcoming month’s Visa Bulletin is the lack of any movement in EB-2 India and EB-3 China and that EB-3 Philippines is unavailable.
Summary of the July 2015 Visa Bulletin – Employment-Based (EB)
Below is a summary of the July 2015 Visa Bulletin with respect to the employment-based categories:
- EB-1 remains current across the board.
- EB-2 for ROW, Mexico and Philippines are all current. EB-2 India remains unchanged at October 1, 2008. EB-2 China moves forward by four (4) months to October 1, 2013.
- EB-3 ROW and Mexico advance by six (6) weeks to April 1, 2015. EB-3 Philippines is unavailable. EB-3 China remains unchanged at September 1, 2011 while EB-3 India advances by only one (1) week to February 1, 2004.
- The “other worker” categories for ROW and Mexico advance by six (6) weeks to April 1, 2015 while Philippines is unavailable. Other workers China remains unchanged at January 1, 2006 while India advances by only one (1) week to February 1, 2004.
- EB-5 China advances by four (4) months to September 1, 2013.
Summary of the July 2015 Visa Bulletin – Family-Based (FB)
Below is a summary of the July 2015 Visa Bulletin with respect to some family-based categories:
- FB-1 ROW, China and India move forward by one (1) month to October 1, 2007. FB-1 Mexico remains unchanged at November 15, 1994 while FB-1 Philippines moves forward but by only two (2) weeks to March 15, 2000.
- FB-2A moves forward again — this month the forward movement is by five (5) weeks to November 8, 2013 for ROW, China, India and Philippines. It moves forward by five (5) weeks to September 15, 2013 for Mexico.
EB-2 India Unchanged – Is Any Forward Movement Likely for the Rest of the Fiscal Year?
After several months of nice forward movement, this month’s Visa Bulletin lack of movement in EB-2 India may be disappointing to many EB-2 India applicants who were hoping for 2009 or 2010 cutoff dates by the end of the fiscal year.
EB-2 India applicants with a priority date earlier than October 1, 2008 can now move forward with their applications (or expect approvals if they have already filed their I-485 applications). Over the last few months, in our Visa Bulletin reports we have been cautioning that the rate of forward movement is slowing down, suggesting that it may eventually stop or even retrogress. The fact that the Department of State is not advancing EB-2 India this month is an indication that they have sufficient applications on file to use the available visa numbers for the remainder of the fiscal year. However, as we are getting into the final two months of the fiscal year, it is possible to see additional forward movements in the August and September 2015 Visa Bulletins to accommodate any additional visa numbers who may be made available from other preference categories.
EB-2 China Advances Significantly; EB-3 China Moderate Forward Movement
EB-2 China continues to advance this month. This month’s forward movement of 4 months, combined with last couple of months’ movements, are among the more significant movements in EB-2 China for some time. EB-3 China, on the other hand, seems to experience significant demand and, as a result, there is no movement this month.
We had noted in our earlier Visa Bulletin alerts that the demand in EB-3 China is expected to rise with the forward date movement and it now seems that the Department of State is trying to moderate the demand by keeping the date steady.
EB-3 Philippines Unavailable
The significant demand in EB-3 for Philippines has caused the Department of State to move back the date significantly over the last few months and this month they are making this category “Unavailable.” This means that there are no visa numbers available for EB-3 Philippines during July 2015. This means that the government cannot authorize any visas for this category — no green card approvals are likely and no new I-485 adjustment of status applications can be filed (regardless of the priority date).
EB-5 China Cutoff Date
Based on significant demand in the EB-5 category from Chinese nationals, the Department of State had introduced a cutoff date for EB-5 China over the last few months. The good news is that this month’s Visa Bulletin moves forward the cutoff date by four months to September 1, 2013.
Current Priority Date?
Our office stands ready to assist in the applicable process to take advantage of a current (or close to current) priority date. Those applicants whose priority dates are current as of the July 2015 Visa Bulletin may be eligible to process their (and their family members’) I-485 Adjustment of Status applications from within the U.S. or process their immigrant visa at a U.S. Consulate abroad.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if our office can help you take advantage of this (very time-sensitive for some) opportunity to file I-485 applications. We are also happy to provide a free quote for preparing and filing your I-485 application.
Further Updates and News
We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics. We also invite you to contact us if our office can be of any assistance in your immigration matters or you have any questions or comments about the July 2015 Visa Bulletin. Finally, if you already haven’t, please consider our Visa Bulletin Predictions tool which provides personalized predictions and charts helping you understand when a particular priority date may become current and what are the movement patterns.No comments
The USCIS receipt or case number is one of the most commonly used numbers, by immigrants and lawyers alike, to track the progress or identify a particular immigration case or filing.
These receipt numbers start with three letters followed by a series of numbers, for example EAC-15-123-45678. Here is how to understand what the numbers mean.
Processing Service Center
The first three letters indicate the USCIS service center which is processing the petition, as follows:
– EAC – Vermont Service Center;
– VSC – Vermont Service Center;
– WAC – California Service Center;
– CSC – California Service Center;
– LIN – Nebraska Service Center;
– NSC – Nebraska Service Center;
– SRC – Texas Service Center;
– TSC – Texas Service Center;
– MSC – National Benefits Center;
– NBC – National Benefits Center; and
– IOE – ELIS (e-Filing).
The next two digits represent the fiscal year in which USCIS received the petition. In the example above, “15″ means that the petition was received by USCIS during Fiscal Year 2015. Note that the government fiscal year runs from October 1st until September 30th.
The next three digits represent the computer workday on which the receipt was processed and the fee was taken. This represents the sequential workday on which USCIS is accepting cases for intake. In the example above, 123 would indicate that this was the 123th processing date of the fiscal year. If necessary, a date of filing can be calculated starting from October 1st.
Case Processing Number
Finally, the last five digits are used to identify uniquely the petition filed. Our observation has been that these are sequential numbers which are issued as cases are being processed at the intake facility. Cases filed together are often given sequential (or close to sequential) numbers for the last five digits (and overall).
Difference between Lockbox Facilities and Service Centers
Please note that there is a distinction between a lockbox facility and a service center. Many USCIS cases have to be filed at a designated “lockbox” facility, as indicated in the relevant form’s instructions. A lockbox facility is essentially a case intake processing center – it is staffed by people who do initial case review such as checking whether all forms and filing fees are included. Assuming the case is properly filed, the lockbox staff would generate a receipt notice (and number), assign the case to the appropriate service center and forward the case file for further review and adjudication by the service center.
Applicants who have a pending USCIS application can check the status of the application online by using the receipt number.
We also invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or comments, or if we can be of any assistance.No comments
The April 9, 2015 AAO decision In Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC (PDF copy) put many H-1B employers (mainly those who place H-1B workers at third-party worksites) in a position to scramble and assess their current level of compliance with the H-1B regulations, as they would be interpreted by USCIS in accordance with the Simeio Solutions decision. In an attempt to provide more clarity with their compliance approach, on May 27, 2015, USCIS issued Draft Guidance on When to File an Amended H-1B Petition after the Simeio Solutions Decision which is effective as of the date of publication but while under public comment period. One of the main goals of the draft guidance is to (1) provide clarification on when an H-1B amendment is required and when it is not required and to (2) establish a 90-day grace period, until August 19, 2015, for H-1B employers to take the necessary steps to become compliance (file LCA and H-1B amendments).
Our Analysis of the In Matter of Simeio Solutions Decision
Very shortly after the AAO decision came out our office provided a very thorough analysis of the AAO decision – including some historical background, pre-Simeio enforcement trends, together with detailed analysis of the decision. We invite our readers to read our analysis for more details and background. We also conducted a highly-attended webinar on the decision and a public archive is available.
USCIS Compliance Guide – When is an H-1B Amendment Required?
An H-1B employer must file an amended H-1B petition if the H-1B employee changed or is going to change his or her place of employment to a worksite location outside of the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) or an “area of intended employment” (as defined at 20 CFR 655.715) covered by the existing approved H-1B petition, even if a new LCA is already certified and posted at the new location. In other words, doing an LCA only for the changed worksite location is not sufficient – an H-1B amendment filing prior to beginning work at the new worksite location is required.
Once the amended H-1B petition is filed, the H-1B employee is allowed to start working at the new worksite location. The employer can (but does not have to) wait for the H-1B amendment decision before the H-1B employer can start work at the new worksite location.
Practical Considerations. From practical standpoint, the requirement to have the H-1B amendment filed before the new worksite location placement begins means that the H-1B amendment process should be initiated at least 2-3 weeks (for LCA certification, preparation, signing and filing of the H-1B petition) before the anticipated starting date for the new worksite location placement. Often third-party client requirements require much faster starting date and this H-1B amendment preparation time should be considered carefully. Another practical consideration is that an H-1B amendment for a third-party worksite placement requires documentation of the third-party client – letters, contracts, and similar documents – which are often difficult or slow to get.
USCIS Compliance Guide – When is an H-1B Amendment NOT Required?
Helpfully, USCIS has clarified when is an H-1B amendment not required.
The New Worksite Location is Within the Same MSA. If the new worksite location is within the same MSA or area of intended employment a new LCA is not required and, by extension, no H-1B amendment is required. It is important to note that the H-1B employer must still post the original LCA in the new worksite location within the same MSA or area of intended employment.
Short-term Placements. Under certain circumstances, an H-1B employer may place an H-1B worker at a new job location for up to 30 days and, in some cases for up to 60 days (where the employee is still based at the original location), without having to obtain a new LCA for the short-term placement location (20 CFR 655.735). In these situations, the H-1B employer does not need to file an amended H-1B petition.
Non-worksite Locations. If the H-1B worker is only going to a non-worksite location, no H-1B amendment is required. According to USCIS, a “non-worksite location” is:
- when the H-1B worker is going to a location to participate in employee developmental activity, such as management conferences and staff seminars;
- the H-1B worker spends little time at any one location; or
- the job is “peripatetic in nature,” such as situations where their primary job is at one location but the H-1B worker occasionally travels for short periods to other locations “on a casual, short-term basis, which can be recurring but not excessive (i.e., not exceeding five consecutive workdays for any one visit by a peripatetic worker, or 10 consecutive workdays for any one visit by a worker who spends most work time at one location and travels occasionally to other locations).” 20 CFR 655.715.
USCIS Compliance Guide – Grace Period to H-1B Employers to File H-1B Amendments by August 19, 2015
Having provided guidance on when an H-1B amendment filing is required and when it is not required, USCIS confirms that non-compliance with the guidance after the August 19, 2015 grace period ends (i.e. not filing an H-1B amendment when it is required) will cause USCIS to take adverse action against employers and that “H-1B employees would not be maintaining their nonimmigrant status.”
Worksite Changes Before May 21, 2015. USCIS has advised that for worksite location changes which occurred at the time of the Simeio Solutions decision, employers will be granted a grace period of 90 days, or until August 19, 2015, to file an H-1B amendment petition. For worksite location changes which occurred before the Simeio Solutions decision (April 9, 2015), USCIS will not take adverse action against the employer or its employees if the employer, in good faith, relied on prior guidance suggesting that an LCA only (and not H-1B petition amendment filing) is sufficient for worksite changes; however, the H-1B employer must still become compliant by filing an H-1B amendment by August 19, 2015.
Worksite Changes After May 21, 2015. The grace period does not seem to apply and USCIS will expect that an H-1B amendment be filed prior to the H-1B worker starting at the new worksite location.
Pending H-1B Amendments. If there is a pending H-1B amendment, USCIS will permit another H-1B amendment to be filed, while an earlier H-1B amendment is pending, allowing the H-1B worker to begin work at the new worksite location upon filing. However, USCIS is cautioning that in this “bridging” situation, any gaps in status or a denial of a “bridge” petition may result in a denial of the status component of any subsequent H-1B petitions.
H-1B Amendment Denial Does not Automatically Invalidate the Previous H-1B Petition. USCIS has confirmed a denial of an H-1B amendment petition would not automatically invalidate the prior worksite location’s H-1B petition and if the H-1B worker returns to the prior worksite location, the H-1B worker may be able to continue to maintain valid H-1B status. In many cases, the sole reason an H-1B worker moves from one location to another is project completion so it is often not possible to return to the prior H-1B worksite location; but when this is possible, this portion of the guidance allows for a backup plan to remain in H-1B status.
Compliance Steps for H-1B Employers
Needless to say, the AAO decision, the USCIS guidance, and the publicity it has received is causing a lot of discussion and anxiety, especially among H-1B employers who place their workers at third-party worksites. Here are some points for better compliance and less H-1B issues (such as H-1B site visits, visa stamp denials and revocations).
Anticipate and Evaluate Possible New Worksite Locations. First, any time there is the possibility of a worksite location change during the term of an H-1B petition, the employer (and perhaps the worker) should have a process to anticipate the timing of such worksite location change, including analyzing the actual worksite change location.
H-1B Amendment Not Required if New Worksite Within Same MSA or Within “Normal Commuting Distance”. The AAO decision and the USCIS guidance confirm that if there is a change to a worksite location within the same MSA or within a normal commuting distance, then the LCA remains valid and no H-1B amendment is required (but LCA posting is required). “Normal commuting distance” can vary depending on the area – but 20, 30 or 50 miles may be considered to be “normal commuting distance.”
File H-1B Amendment “Immediately”. The regulations require that the H-1B employer “shall immediately notify” USCIS when there is a change in the terms of the petition – essentially, an H-1B amendment must be filed before the new worksite location placement takes place. Since a new LCA takes up to seven business days, the LCA and the H-1B amendment filing process should be anticipated and started at least 2-3 weeks before the new worksite location placement begins. Even if this is not possible, the LCA/H-1B amendment should be done as soon as possible.
Late Compliance (H-1B amendment) is Better than No Compliance. We would like to encourage H-1B employers who have not done the necessary H-1B compliance and who have relied on LCAs only for worksite changes to consider preparing and filing H-1B amendments as soon as possible and before the August 19, 2015 grace period expiration.
What Kind of H-1B Cases Are in Jeopardy? We do not know how much additional scrutiny USCIS would impose on existing petitions for worksite compliance, but mismatch between an actual worksite and H-1B petition is likely to cause H-1B visa stamp delays/denials and, ultimately, consular returns. Similarly, H-1B site visits are likely to cause problems which would lead ultimately to a Notice of Intent to Revoke and a likely H-1B revocation. H-1B extensions may also face higher scrutiny to establish current compliance and status as part of the H-1B extension adjudication process.
We would like to iterate clearly that based on recent developments and trends we see, we are recommending that H-1B amendment petitions be filed when there is a change of job location all the time and before the placing the H-1B worker at the new jobsite. Also, employers should evaluate their H-1B workers’ case files to determine whether there are cases which need to be brought into compliance before the August 19, 2015 grace period expires.
We are also happy to work with our clients to make a comprehensive compliance plan for prompt and cost-effective LCA/H-1B compliance. H-1B employers who routinely place workers at third-party worksites should consider making such LCA/H-1B compliance plans. Contact us to allow us to evaluate your needs and provide suggestions for compliance planning.
We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or comments, or if we can be of any assistance with analyzing or filing H-1B petitions, including amendments.No comments