<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Labor Immigration Law&#187; EB-2 &#8211; Immigration Attorneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/topics/eb2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com</link>
	<description>United States Labor Immigration Law News and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>August 2010 Visa Bulletin – EB-2 and EB-3 Substantial Forward Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/07/august-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-and-eb-3-substantial-forward-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/07/august-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-and-eb-3-substantial-forward-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china mainland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldwide demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The eleventh visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.
Summary of the August 2010 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5092.html">August 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The eleventh visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin &#8211; Employment-Based (EB)<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Below is a summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) remains current, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">EB-2 China moves forward by slightly over three (3) months</span> to March 1, 2006, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">EB-2 India moves forward by five (5) months</span> from October 1, 2005 to March 1, 2006.</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;">EB-3 ROW moves forward by nine and a half months (9.5) months</span> to June 1, 2004, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">EB-3 China  moves forward by slightly over one (1) month</span> to September 22, 2003, while EB-3 India <span style="text-decoration: underline;">moves forward by slightly over one (1) month</span> to January 1, 2002.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.</li>
<li>The &#8220;other worker&#8221; category moves forward by a few months, to May 15, 2002 for ROW and China and to January 1, 2002 for India.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Substantial Forward Movement Continues<br />
</strong></p>
<p>The notable forward movement in EB-2 and some EB-3 categories continues in this month&#8217;s visa bulletin as well.   This significant movement is due to the fact that there are some visa numbers available from other countries have not been reached yet and such countries&#8217; per-country limit has not been reached.  As a result, as we are getting close to the end of the fiscal year, and after taking the worldwide demand into account, the State Department has determined only 8,100 of the total available EB-2 preference numbers would be used in that quarter.   In this case, the unused 3,500 numbers could then be made available to China-mainland born and India regardless of their per-country limits.</p>
<p><strong>Forward Movement Is Temporary</strong></p>
<p>Note that the substantial forward movement  does not indicate a trend; instead, the last two visa bulletins&#8217; forward movement was to ensure that no available visa numbers remain unused due to poor allocation of the unused numbers.  We expect that there be some retrogression over the next 1-3 months.</p>
<p>Please do not hesitate to <a href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/contacts">contact us</a> if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application, should your priority date become current.</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 371px; width: 1px; height: 1px;"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w:Word11KerningPairs /> <w:CachedColBalance /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-" /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"   DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"   LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:roman; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-unhide:no; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} span.msoIns 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-style-name:""; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single; 	color:teal;} .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-default-props:yes; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 	{page:WordSection1;} --><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} --> <!--[endif]--><script src="aug2010_files/jquery-1.js" type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
;;
// ]]&gt;</script><script src="aug2010_files/superfish.js" type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
;;
// ]]&gt;</script><script src="aug2010_files/tsg_main.js" type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
;;
// ]]&gt;</script><script src="aug2010_files/foresee-trigger.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script id="foresee-surveydef" src="aug2010_files/foresee-surveydef.js" type="text/javascript"></script><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;;"><span class="msoIns"><ins datetime="2010-07-13T07:39" cite="mailto:Author">). Applicants from other countries that have not yet reached their per-country limit have reported a total demand of 6,500 numbers. After taking the worldwide demand into account, it is determined that as a result of the China-mainland born and India per-country limits only 8,100 of the total available Employment Second preference numbers would be used in that quarter. In this instance, the otherwise unused 3,500 numbers could then be made available to China-mainland born and India regardless of their per-country limits. Should that occur, the same cut-off date would be applied to each country, since numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability.</ins></span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/07/august-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-and-eb-3-substantial-forward-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2010 Visa Bulletin – EB-2 India Jumps Ahead by Ten Months; Gradual Movement in EB-3</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/06/july-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-india-jumps-ahead-by-ten-months-gradual-movement-in-eb-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/06/july-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-india-jumps-ahead-by-ten-months-gradual-movement-in-eb-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb2 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The July 2010 Visa Bulletin was released earlier this afternoon by the State Department.  The tenth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.
Summary of the July [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5019.html">July 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was released earlier this afternoon by the State Department.  The tenth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin</strong></p>
<p>Below is a summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China remains unchanged at November 22, 2005, and, most notably, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">EB-2 India moves forward by ten (10) months</span> from February 1, 2005 to October 1, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, EB-3 China also moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by one (1) month to November 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is  unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finally Movement in EB-2 India</strong></p>
<p>Previously we wrote about the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category for the past four months.  Finally, there is a substantial forward movement in EB-2 India which should benefit at least some of our clients and readers.  Please do not hesitate us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/06/july-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-eb-2-india-jumps-ahead-by-ten-months-gradual-movement-in-eb-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2010 Visa Bulletin &#8211; More of the Same: Gradual Forward Movement; No Change for EB-2 India</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/05/june-2010-visa-bulletin-more-of-the-same-gradual-forward-movement-no-change-for-eb-2-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/05/june-2010-visa-bulletin-more-of-the-same-gradual-forward-movement-no-change-for-eb-2-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china mainland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominican republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PERM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The June  2010 Visa Bulletin was released earlier today by the State Department.  The  ninth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward  across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India (no change  this month, for the third month in a row).
The State Department added another country to the list of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4879.html">June  2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was released earlier today by the State Department.  The  ninth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward  across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India (no change  this month, for the third month in a row).</p>
<p>The State Department added another country to the list of oversubscribed countries &#8211; Dominican Republic.  This means that for all family and employment-based categories, there is now a category for the Dominican Republic, in addition to China (mainland-born), India, Mexico and the Philippines.</p>
<p><strong>Summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin</strong></p>
<p>Below is a summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (2) months  to November 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1,  2005.  This is the third month in a row when EB-2 India has remained  unchanged.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to June 22, 2003,  EB-3 China moves forward also by two (2) months to June 22,  2003,  while EB-3 India moves forward by three (3) weeks to October 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the  exception of Mexico which is now unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Why Does EB-2 India Not Move?</strong></p>
<p>Our readers and clients have asked us what is the cause of the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category.  Over the past few years, with the severe retrogression of EB-3 India, many Indian nationals have been able to start and obtain an approval of a new I-140 under the EB-2 category.  Our office has handled a number of such EB-3 to EB-2 &#8220;upgrade&#8221; cases.  As a result, many of the EB-3 India applicants are now EB-2 India applicants, resulting in delay in the movement of EB-2 India priority dates.   We would be happy to analyze your EB-3 case and help you if you can &#8220;port&#8221; it to EB-2 &#8211; please <a href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/contacts">contact us</a> for a free initial consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/05/june-2010-visa-bulletin-more-of-the-same-gradual-forward-movement-no-change-for-eb-2-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2010 Visa Bulletin – Gradual Forward Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/04/may-2010-visa-bulletin-gradual-forward-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/04/may-2010-visa-bulletin-gradual-forward-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The May 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The eighth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India (no change this month, for the second month in a row).   A notable movement can be seen in the EB-3 India category where the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4805.html">May 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The eighth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India (no change this month, for the second month in a row).   A notable movement can be seen in the EB-3 India category where the priority date moved forward by three weeks.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of the May 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (1) month to September 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1, 2005.  This is the second month in a row when EB-2 India has remained unchanged.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost three (3) months to April 22, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by almost (3) months to April 22,  2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by three (3) weeks to October 1, 2001.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is now unavailable.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/04/may-2010-visa-bulletin-gradual-forward-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2010 Visa Bulletin – Gradual Forward Movement, EB-2 India Unchanged</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/03/april-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-gradual-forward-movement-eb-2-india-unchanged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/03/april-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-gradual-forward-movement-eb-2-india-unchanged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb2 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb3 india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The April 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The seventh visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward movement.  There is some gradual forward movement across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India and EB-3 Mexico which did not change this month.   A notable movement is in EB-3 India category [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4747.html">April 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The seventh visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward movement.  There is some gradual forward movement across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India and EB-3 Mexico which did not change this month.   A notable movement is in EB-3 India category where the priority date moved forward by over two months.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of the April 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by six (6) weeks to August 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unchanged</span> at February 1, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost fix (6) weeks to February 1, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by six (6) weeks to February 1, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by over two (2) months to September 8, 2001.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/03/april-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-gradual-forward-movement-eb-2-india-unchanged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2010 Visa Bulletin – Slow Forward Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/02/march-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-forward-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/02/march-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-forward-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[july 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The March 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The sixth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the third for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  There is some slow forward movement across most employment-based categories.   The most significant movement noted this month is in EB-3 ROW and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4659.html">March 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The sixth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the third for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  There is some slow forward movement across most employment-based categories.   The most significant movement noted this month is in EB-3 ROW and EB-3 China (both move forward by 3 months).  EB-2 India and EB-3 India dates move forward only slightly.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of the March 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by six (6) weeks to July 8, 2005, and EB-2 India, moves forward by only one (1) week to February 1, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost three (3) months to December 15, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by almost three (3) months also to December 15, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by only one (1) week to July 1, 2001.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/02/march-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-forward-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2010 Visa Bulletin – Slow Progress for Some, No Movement for India</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/01/february-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-progress-for-some-no-movement-for-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/01/february-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-progress-for-some-no-movement-for-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The February 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The fifth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the second for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  There is no movement for India across all employment-based categories.   For many other categories, the only forward movement is in the 1-2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4611.html">February 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The fifth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the second for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  There is no movement for India across all employment-based categories.   For many other categories, the only forward movement is in the 1-2 months range.  Here is a summary of the February 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves <span style="text-decoration: underline;">forward by three (3) weeks</span> to May 22, 2005, and EB-2 India, again, remains <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unchanged</span> at January 22, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW <span style="text-decoration: underline;">moves forward by almost two (2) months</span> to September 22, 2002, EB-3 China moves <span style="text-decoration: underline;">forward by almost two (2) months</span> also to September 22, 2002, while EB-3 India remains <span style="text-decoration: underline;">unchanged</span>.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2010/01/february-2010-visa-bulletin-%e2%80%93-slow-progress-for-some-no-movement-for-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/visa-bulletin-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/visa-bulletin-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr charlie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/visa-bulletin-predictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a November 2009 AILA meeting, Mr. Charlie Oppenheim, who is Chief of the Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting Division at the Department of State (or also known as the person who determines the visa bulletin dates), has indicated some ways in which the visa bulletin numbers will move over the next few months.
Mr. Oppenheim&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a November 2009 AILA meeting, Mr. Charlie Oppenheim, who is Chief of the Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting Division at the Department of State (or also known as the person who determines the visa bulletin dates), has indicated some ways in which the visa bulletin numbers will move over the next few months.</p>
<p><strong><u>Mr. Oppenheim&#8217;s Comments</u></strong></p>
<p>Although there is no guarantee that Mr. Oppenheim&#8217;s comments to AILA would turn into reality, he has been very accurate and careful in his comments in the past.</p>
<p><strong>EB-3 Worldwide (ROW)</strong>.  Visa numbers are expected to progress to April-August 2005.  Such movement will be gradual and is expected to start in January or February of 2010.</p>
<p><strong>EB-2 China and India</strong>.  Annual limits are expected to be reached no later than May.  It is possible that otherwise unused second preference numbers to be made available.  This makes the cut-off date for both EB-2 India and China to progress to October-December 2005.</p>
<p><strong>EB-3 China</strong>.  It is expected to move along with EB-3 ROW over the next few months.  The fiscal year is expected to end with a June-September 2003 cut-off.</p>
<p><strong>EB-3 India</strong>.  Very slow movement expected.  There are 58,000 pending applications and it is expected to move only  up to five (5) weeks over the entire fiscal year.</p>
<p><strong><u>Our Conclusion</u></strong></p>
<p>While there are some good news in this announcement, it becomes clear that some categories, especially EB-3 India, become very undesirable and we strongly recommend clients and readers who are in EB-3 India to consider either filing in EB-2, if possible, given education and experience.  Many EB-3 India applicants who have been waiting for 4-5 years already find themselves facing another 4-5 year wait.  As a result, we often see second EB-2 applications using the recently gained experience filed (often by switching employers) by retaining the earlier EB-3 priority date.  Please contact us if we can help you understand whether your case may qualify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/visa-bulletin-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2010 Visa Bulletin &#8211; Slow Forward Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/january-2010-visa-bulletin-slow-forward-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/january-2010-visa-bulletin-slow-forward-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/january-2010-visa-bulletin-slow-forward-movement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The January 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The fourth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the first for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  For many categories, the only forward movement is in the 1-2 months range.  Here is a summary of the January 2010 Visa [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4597.html">January 2010 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The fourth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 and the first for the calendar 2010 does not bring much movement.  For many categories, the only forward movement is in the 1-2 months range.  Here is a summary of the January 2010 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves <u>forward by one (1) month</u> to May 1, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at January 22, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW <u>moves forward by two (2) months</u> to August 1, 2002, EB-3 China moves <u>forward by two (2) months</u> to August 1, 2002, while EB-3 India <u>moves forward by almost two (2) months</u> to June 22, 2001.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001, except for India which moves forward by <u>one month</u> to June 1, 2001.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/12/january-2010-visa-bulletin-slow-forward-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; Minor Forward Movement for EB-3 China and India</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/10/november-2009-visa-bulletin-minor-forward-movement-for-eb-3-china-and-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/10/november-2009-visa-bulletin-minor-forward-movement-for-eb-3-china-and-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/10/november-2009-visa-bulletin-minor-forward-movement-for-eb-3-china-and-india/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The November 2009 Visa Bulletin was released by the State Department.  The second visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 does not bring much movement.  The slight forward movement can be observed in EB-2 and EB-3 China and in EB-3 India.  All other categories, including EB-3 Rest of World (ROW) remain unchanged.  Here is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4576.html">November 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> was released by the State Department.  The second visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 does not bring much movement.  The slight forward movement can be observed in EB-2 and EB-3 China and in EB-3 India.  All other categories, including EB-3 Rest of World (ROW) remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the November 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 China moves forward by a <u>week</u> to April 1, 2005 while EB-2 ROW remains current and EB-2 India remains unchanged at January 22, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW remains unchanged at June 1, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by <u>three months</u> to June 1, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by <u>one week</u> to April 22, 2001.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001, except for India which moves forward by <u>one week</u> to April 22, 2001.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/10/november-2009-visa-bulletin-minor-forward-movement-for-eb-3-china-and-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-2 Minor Forward Movement, EB-3 Available, EB-5 Unavailable</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/09/october-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-available-eb-2-minor-forward-movement-eb-5-unavailable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/09/october-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-available-eb-2-minor-forward-movement-eb-5-unavailable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[april]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[february 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[november 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/09/october-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-available-eb-2-minor-forward-movement-eb-5-unavailable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The October 2009 Visa Bulletin which is the first visa bulletin for the new FY2010 fiscal year was released earlier today by the State Department.   This October 2009 Visa Bulletin has been widely expected not only to see the EB-3 category go back to some availability of visas but also to use the movement in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4575.html">October 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> which is the first visa bulletin for the new FY2010 fiscal year was released earlier today by the State Department.   This October 2009 Visa Bulletin has been widely expected not only to see the EB-3 category go back to some availability of visas but also to use the movement in this month&#8217;s Visa Bulletin to gauge the level of visa numbers movements for this upcoming fiscal year.</p>
<p><strong>EB-2 Numbers Indicate Minor Movement</strong></p>
<p>The October 2009 Visa Bulletin dates suggest a minor forward movement as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-2 China moves forward by a little over two (2) months from January 8, 2005 to <u>March 22, 2005</u>;</li>
<li>EB-2 India moves forward  by two (2) weeks from January 8, 2005 to <u>January 22, 2005</u>; and</li>
<li>EB-2 Rest of World (&#8220;ROW&#8221;) remains current.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>EB-3 Visas Are Available Although Forward Movement May Be Slow</strong></p>
<p>As expected, the October 2009 Visa Bulletin brings a number of changes.  Most notably, the EB-3 category is no longer unavailable and the visa cut-off dates are as listed below.  We also provide the visa cut-off dates from the April 2009 Visa Bulletin which was the last time EB-3 visas were available.</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-3 China has a cut-off date of <u>February 22, 2002</u> (compared to March 1, 2003 in the April 2009 Visa Bulletin);</li>
<li>EB-3 India has a cut-off date of <u>April 15, 2001</u>  (compared to November 1, 2001 in the April 2009 Visa Bulletin);</li>
<li>EB-3 ROW has a cut-off date of <u>June 1, 2002</u>  (compared to March 1, 2003 in the April 2009 Visa Bulletin).</li>
</ul>
<p>We have included a comparison with the April 2009 EB-3 visa numbers to illustrate that even though the State Department has made EB-3 visas available, the fact that the government chose to set cut-off dates in October 2009 which are earlier than the April 2009 cut-off dates indicates that a slow movement in EB-3 over the 2009 fiscal year is to be expected.</p>
<p><strong>EB-5 Is Unavailable</strong></p>
<p>The EB-5 category is now unavailable.  This is due to the expiration of the EB-5 Pilot program on September 30, 2009, which means that no visas can be issued after September 30 under the EB-5 category until Congress extends it.  Once this happens, the visa availability is expected to become current.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/09/october-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-available-eb-2-minor-forward-movement-eb-5-unavailable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-2 India and China Move Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/08/september-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/08/september-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerical limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/08/september-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The September 2009 Visa Bulletin was released by the State Department.  The only change, in comparison to the August 2009 Visa Bulletin, is the forward movement in the EB-2 China and India categories which changed from January 1, 2003 to January 8, 2005.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the September [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4558.html">September 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> was released by the State Department.  The only change, in comparison to the August 2009 Visa Bulletin, is the forward movement in the EB-2 China and India categories which changed <u>from January 1, 2003 to January 8, 2005</u>.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the September 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except as noted above for EB-2 China and India:  EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, EB-2 China and EB-2 India are January 8, 2005.</li>
<li>EB-3 is unavailable for all categories.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers are also unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p>Based on the last few visa bulletins, visa availability during the final quarter of the fiscal year is likely to remain very limited as some employment-based categories approach or have already reached their annual numerical limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/08/september-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-2 India and China Move Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/07/august-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/07/august-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lengthy delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerical limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/07/august-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2009 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The only change, in comparison to the July 2009 Visa Bulletin, is the forward movement in the EB-2 China and India categories which changed from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2003 .  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4539.html">August 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> was just released by the State Department.  The only change, in comparison to the July 2009 Visa Bulletin, is the forward movement in the EB-2 China and India categories which changed <u>from January 1, 2000 to October 1, 2003 </u>.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the August 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except as noted above for EB-2 China and India:  EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, EB-2 China and EB-2 India are October 1, 2003.</li>
<li>EB-3 is unavailable for all categories.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers are also unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p>In one of the comments to the August 2009 Visa Bulletin, the State Department notes that the retrogression of EB-2 China has been necessary to take into account the high demand of visa issuances so far this fiscal year.   As a result, visa availability during the final quarter of the fiscal year is likely to remain very limited as some employment-based categories approach or have already reached their annual numerical limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/07/august-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-and-china-move-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorandum on Equivalency of Foreign Medical Degrees</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/memorandum-on-equivalency-of-foreign-medical-degrees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/memorandum-on-equivalency-of-foreign-medical-degrees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bachelor of medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basic sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of medical examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degree equivalent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education credential evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equivalency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign education credential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor certification application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[md degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national board of medical examiners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unrestricted license]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/memorandum-on-equivalency-of-foreign-medical-degrees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald Neufeld, in a Memorandum dated June 17, 2009 provides some guidance on the equivalency of foreign medical degrees for the purpose of qualifying for the EB-2 category.
A U.S. medical degree is obtained after completing a bachelor&#8217;s degree and as a result, a U.S. medical doctor degree is considered to be an advanced degree. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Neufeld, in a <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/neufeld-memorandum-on-mds.pdf">Memorandum dated June 17, 2009</a> provides some guidance on the equivalency of foreign medical degrees for the purpose of qualifying for the EB-2 category.</p>
<p>A U.S. medical degree is obtained after completing a bachelor&#8217;s degree and as a result, a U.S. medical doctor degree is considered to be an advanced degree. In many other countries a person may be admitted to medical school directly out of high school. In these instances the program of study for the foreign medical degree is longer in length (generally 5-7 years in duration) than is required for a less specialized foreign bachelor’s degree (generally 3-4 years in duration.) In some countries the name of the degree is &#8220;Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery&#8221;, and the program of study may involve ONLY medicine, to include some limited basic sciences. A foreign medical degree may qualify as the equivalent of a U.S. MD degree and thus an advanced degree for EB2 purposes if, at the time of the filing of the labor certification application, the following two conditions are met:</p>
<p>1.  The alien beneficiary:</p>
<blockquote><p>A. Has been awarded a foreign medical degree from a medical school that requires applicants to obtain a bachelor’s degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor’s degree as a requirement for admission, or;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>B. Has been awarded a foreign medical degree and a foreign education credential evaluation is provided that credibly describes how the foreign medical degree is equivalent to a medical degree obtained from an accredited medical school in the United States, or;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>C. Has been awarded a foreign medical degree and has passed the National Board of Medical Examiners Examination (NBMEE) examination or an equivalent examination, such as the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), Steps 1, 2 &amp; 3,</p></blockquote>
<p>2.  The alien beneficiary was fully eligible for the position described on the labor certification application, on the date that it was filed, by establishing that:</p>
<blockquote><p> A. He or she had a full and unrestricted license to practice medicine in the state of intended employment and continues to hold such an unrestricted license, or;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>B. His or her foreign medical degree is shown to meet the medical degree requirements to be eligible for full and unrestricted licensure specified by the medical board governing the place of intended employment.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Neufeld memorandum further describes requirements for filing a petition for a foreign national holding a medical doctor degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/memorandum-on-equivalency-of-foreign-medical-degrees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-140 Premium Processing Service to Resume June 29, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/i-140-premium-processing-service-to-resume-june-29-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/i-140-premium-processing-service-to-resume-june-29-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card applicants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[determine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expedite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expedited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fielding questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national interest waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinstatement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/i-140-premium-processing-service-to-resume-june-29-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After USCIS suspended temporarily the I-140 premium processing service on July 2, 2007, we have been constantly fielding questions on when the temporary suspension would end.  Over the past few weeks there was increased speculation that premium processing for Form I-140 would resume.   Earlier this week, USCIS confirmed that in fact premium processing for I-140 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After USCIS suspended temporarily the I-140 premium processing service on July 2, 2007, we have been constantly fielding questions on when the temporary suspension would end.  Over the past few weeks there was increased speculation that premium processing for Form I-140 would resume.   Earlier this week, USCIS confirmed that in fact <u>premium processing for I-140 resumes effective June 29, 2009</u>.</p>
<p>The main reason for the temporary suspension of the I-140 premium processing was the increased volume of I-140 applications in the summer of 2007.  USCIS has now determined that due to its backlog  reduction efforts, it can continue processing I-140s on expedited basis.</p>
<p><u>Not All I-140s Would Qualify &#8211; EB-1(c)  and EB-2 NIW Are Excluded</u></p>
<p>USCIS  has indicated that not all Form I-140 filings would qualify for premium processing.   The government will accept premium processing requests for Form I-140s involving EB-1 Aliens with Extraordinary Ability, EB-1 Outstanding Professors and Researchers, EB-2 Members of Professions with Advanced Degrees or Exceptional Ability <strong><u>not</u></strong> seeking a National Interest Waiver, EB-3 Professionals, EB-3 Skilled Workers, and EB-3 Workers other than Skilled Workers and Professionals.</p>
<p>Premium processing service <u>is still not available</u> for Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, involving EB-1 Multinational Executives and Managers and EB-2 Members of Professions with Advanced Degrees or Exceptional Ability seeking a National Interest Waiver.</p>
<p><u>Conclusion</u></p>
<p>With the reinstatement of premium processing for most I-140s, USCIS provides an important strategic tool for many employment-based green card applicants.  While premium processing for I-140 was available for holders of H-1B status who were in danger of &#8220;H-ing out&#8221;, the expanded scope of premium processing now allows many petitioners (and their respective beneficiaries) to speed up the I-140 process in order to gain advantage of H-1B 3-year renewal provisions or to generally speed up the processing of one&#8217;s green card application.</p>
<p>While upgrading a pending I-140 case to premium processing makes sense in some cases, it is not cost-justified in all cases.  We are happy to consult and help in evaluating the best course of action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/i-140-premium-processing-service-to-resume-june-29-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reactions to the &#8220;Grim&#8221; Visa Number Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/reactions-to-the-grim-visa-number-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/reactions-to-the-grim-visa-number-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grim predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/reactions-to-the-grim-visa-number-predictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wrote last week about the &#8220;grim&#8221; predictions by Charles Oppenheim (who is with the Department of State) about the future of the visa numbers for green card employment-based preference categories.  We have received many comments and reactions from readers and clients and we share many of the concerns raised following Mr. Oppenheim&#8217;s comments.
We read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/visa-bulletin-and-visa-number-predictions-and-availability-comments-bad-news-for-eb-india-and-china/">wrote last week about the &#8220;grim&#8221; predictions by Charles Oppenheim</a> (who is with the Department of State) about the future of the visa numbers for green card employment-based preference categories.  We have received many comments and reactions from readers and clients and we share many of the concerns raised following Mr. Oppenheim&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>We read a recent piece written by AILA President Bernard Wolfsdorf commenting on the visa number predictions.  We thought that it may be an interesting read and follow-up on the conversation started in the immigration community regarding the visa numbers scheme.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Does it make sense to educate international students at our top universities and medical centers and then, when at the point where they are ready to contribute to our economy, say it’s time to go home? It has been 20 years since President Bush Senior increased the quota for employment immigrant visas. While scientific advances have occurred at lightning speed in these past two decades, employment visa quotas have been hopelessly encased in amber.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigrant-visa-numbers-hopelessly.html"><span class="post-author vcard"> <span class="fn">Bernard P. Wolfsdorf,</span></span> Immigrant Visa Numbers Hopelessly Encased In Amber, June 12, 2009</a>.<span class="post-author vcard"><span class="fn"></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/reactions-to-the-grim-visa-number-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Bulletin and Visa Number Predictions and Availability Comments &#8211; Bad News for EB India and China</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/visa-bulletin-and-visa-number-predictions-and-availability-comments-bad-news-for-eb-india-and-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/visa-bulletin-and-visa-number-predictions-and-availability-comments-bad-news-for-eb-india-and-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concurrent filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grim prognosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remainder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state visa office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/visa-bulletin-and-visa-number-predictions-and-availability-comments-bad-news-for-eb-india-and-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the annual AILA conference, Mr. Charles Oppenheim of the Department of State Visa Office (he is the person who is largely involved in the movement of visa numbers) provided some thoughts and predictions on the movement of visa numbers for the remainder of the fiscal year 2009 (FY2009 the end of which is September [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the annual AILA conference, Mr. Charles Oppenheim of the Department of State Visa Office (he is the person who is largely involved in the movement of visa numbers) provided some thoughts and predictions on the movement of visa numbers for the remainder of the fiscal year 2009 (FY2009 the end of which is September 30, 2009) and beyond.</p>
<p><strong>Lower Unused Visa Numbers in EB-4 and EB-5.  </strong>According to Mr. Oppenheim, EB-4 and EB-5 have seen increased demand which may result in retrogression.  However, what is more important, the high demand of EB-4 and EB-5 has resulted in a fewer visa numbers being made available to other categories, such as EB-2 and EB-3.  This has resulted in an increased pressure on the visa numbers for EB-3, EB-2 and possibly EB-1 for China and India.</p>
<p><strong>EB-1 Demand Increased; EB-1 China or India May See Retrogression</strong>.  Mr. Oppenheim noted that demand for EB-1 Rest of World (ROW) has increased but it expected to remain current until the end of FY2009.  However, EB-1 for China and India, while current for July 2009, may require the establishment of a cut-off date if EB-1 demand remains heavy.  This is important because EB-1 for China and India may no longer be the &#8220;instant concurrent-filing&#8221; category.  <u>We urge our readers and clients from China or India who are considering EB-1 to consider filing as early as possible.</u></p>
<p><strong>EB-2 China and India &#8211; &#8220;Grim&#8221; Prognosis; Long Delays Are Likely</strong>.  Mr. Oppenheim did not deliver good news for EB-2 China and India applicants.  The July 2009 cut-off date is January 1, 2009, and may become unavailable in August or September 2009.  There are reported 25,000 EB-2 India cases which have been reviewed by USCIS and are waiting at the Department of State for a visa number. By law, all countries have a limit of 2,800 EB-2 numbers per year plus any &#8220;fall across&#8221; and &#8220;fall down&#8221; numbers from EB-1, EB-4 or EB-5 categories or from the EB-2 category from other countries.  Therefore, and unfortunately, without legislative relief, the waiting time for Indian or Chinese EB-2 applicants may be measured in <u>years, even decades</u>.</p>
<p><strong>EB-3 ROW</strong>.  The EB-3 will remain unavailable the remainder of this fiscal year. As the Department of Labor worked its way through the long backlog of Alien Labor Certification cases, there were tens of thousands of I-485 applications with priority dates in 2004 and earlier years which were processed by USCIS this year. The Department of State currently estimates that, as of <u>October 1, 2009, the EB3 worldwide cut-off date will be March 1, 2003</u>. There will be extended delays in this category.</p>
<p><strong>EB-3 China, India and Mexico</strong>.  According to Mr. Oppenheim, EB-3 numbers for China, India and Mexico applicants will be unavailable for the remainder of the fiscal year.  Furthermore, it is estimated that, based on current demand for visa numbers that as of October 1, 2009, the following cut-off dates could be established: <u>China will be March 1, 2003</u>; India will be <u>November 1, 2001</u>; and <u>Mexico will be March 1, 2003</u>. These estimates are based on &#8220;current demand&#8221; in the first 7 ½ months of FY2009, and a lot could change between now and early September when October dates are established (meaning that these predicted cut-off dates may retrogress even more).</p>
<p><strong>General Numbers Update</strong>.  Finally, Mr. Oppenheim provided some numbers on the cases pending at various stages of immigrant processing.  There are approximately 25,000 EB-2 and 25,000 EB-3 applications queued at the State Department awaiting visa numbers.  There are ~2.7 million family-based applicants on the waiting list for consular processing.  There also could be ~50,000 employment-based applicants on waiting lists for consular processing.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>.  The news from Mr. Oppenheim is not good.  Long delays and limits on some categories are to be expected.  Indian and Chinese applicants for EB-2 and EB-3 face years, even decades-long, wait period for a visa number.  EB-1 is also under pressure for Chinese and Indians.   We will continue monitoring the visa numbers and provide updates and reliable predictions as we counsel our clients on the best ways to avoid lengthy green card delays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/visa-bulletin-and-visa-number-predictions-and-availability-comments-bad-news-for-eb-india-and-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; No Change Except EB-2 China Retrogression</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/july-2009-visa-bulletin-no-change-except-eb-2-china-retrogression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/july-2009-visa-bulletin-no-change-except-eb-2-china-retrogression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lengthy delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerical limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/july-2009-visa-bulletin-no-change-except-eb-2-china-retrogression/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The July 2009 Visa Bulletin was released today.  Unfortunately, as expected, the only change is the EB-2 China category which changed from February 15, 2005 to January 1, 2000.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the July 2009 Visa Bulletin:

EB-1 remains current across the board.
EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4512.html#">July 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> was released today.  Unfortunately, as expected, the only change is the EB-2 China category which changed <u>from February 15, 2005 to January 1, 2000</u>.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the July 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except as noted above for EB-2 China:  EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, EB-2 China and EB-2 India are January 1, 2000.</li>
<li>EB-3 is unavailable for all categories.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numbers are also unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p>In one of the comments to the July 2009 Visa Bulletin, the State Department notes that the retrogression of EB-2 China has been necessary to take into account the high demand of visa issuances so far this fiscal year.   As a result, visa availability during the final quarter of the fiscal year is likely to remain very limited as some employment-based categories approach or have already reached their annual numerical limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/06/july-2009-visa-bulletin-no-change-except-eb-2-china-retrogression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-2 India Retrogresses Substantially</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/june-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-severely-retrogresses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/june-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-severely-retrogresses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lengthy delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/june-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-severely-retrogresses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The June 2009 Visa Bulletin was released today.  Unfortunately, the only change is the EB-2 India category which changed from February 15, 2004 to January 1, 2000.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the June 2009 Visa Bulletin:

EB-1 remains current across the board.
EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except as noted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4497.html">June 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> was released today.  Unfortunately, the only change is the EB-2 India category which changed <u>from February 15, 2004 to January 1, 2000</u>.  All other categories remain unchanged.  Here is a summary of the June 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories except as noted above for EB-2 India:  EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, EB-2 China remains February 15, 2005, and EB-2 India retrogressed to January 1, 2000.</li>
<li>EB-3 is unavailable for all categories.</li>
<li>Other worker visa numebers are also unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p>In one of the comments to the June 2009 Visa Bulletin, the State Department notes that &#8220;applicant demand for numbers, primarily for adjustment of status cases at Citizenship and Immigration Services offices, has been extremely heavy throughout the year.   As a result, visa availability during the final quarter could become limited as categories approach their annual numerical limits.&#8221;   At this point, it is not clear whether EB-2 will stay at January 1, 2000 for this month (June 2009) only or it will remain there for a few months due to the extremely heavy EB-2 India visa number demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/june-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-2-india-severely-retrogresses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AAO Processing Times Report (May 1, 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/aao-processing-times-report-may-1-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/aao-processing-times-report-may-1-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-290B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative appeals office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[may 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedural aspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading rooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/aao-processing-times-report-may-1-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our firm handles a fair amount of appeals with the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) and we often receive inquiries not only about about the procedural aspects of an AAO appeal but also about the current processing times for AAO cases.
About the AAO
As a short preliminary background matter, the AAO is an appeals office which handles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our firm handles a fair amount of appeals with the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) and we often receive inquiries not only about about the <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/03/aao-procedure-frequently-asked-questions/">procedural aspects of an AAO appeal</a> but also about the current processing times for AAO cases.</p>
<p><strong>About the AAO</strong></p>
<p>As a short preliminary background matter, the AAO is an appeals office which handles appeals of certain decisions made by USCIS field offices and regional procssing centers.  The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires that all AAO decisions be made available to the public.  As a result, AAO decisions are accessible in reading rooms at USCIS headquarters here in Washington, DC and at field offices.  Also, some (but not all) AAO decisions are <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/uscis-ext-templating/uscis/jspoverride/errFrameset.jsp">available online</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Current AAO Processing Time</strong>s</p>
<p>USCIS has released the average processing times for cases pending at the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as of May 1, 2009.</p>
<p>Among the most notable AAO processing times:</p>
<ul>
<li>H-1B appeal takes 15 months (compared to 13 months when last reported in March 2009);</li>
<li>I-140 EB1 Extraordinary Ability takes 10 months, Multinational Manager or Executive takes 9 months while EB1 Outstanding Professor or Researcher category is current (meaning less than 6 months);</li>
<li>I-140 EB2 (Advanced Degree) takes 24 months (compared to 21 months in March 2009) while EB2 (NIW) is current (meaning less than 6 months); and</li>
<li>I-140 EB3 Skilled Worker takes 21 months (compared to 20 months in March 2009) while EB3 Other Worker takes 16 months (compared to 22 months in March 2009) on appeal.</li>
</ul>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aao-report-may-1-2009.pdf">AAO Processing Times</a> report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/05/aao-processing-times-report-may-1-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-3 Unavailable; EB-2 Unchanged</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/04/may-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-unavailable-eb-2-unchanged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/04/may-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-unavailable-eb-2-unchanged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lengthy delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/04/may-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-unavailable-eb-2-unchanged/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The May 2009 Visa Bulletin has been released.  Unfortunately, and as expected, all EB-3 categories are now &#8220;unavailable.&#8221;  Also, there is no movement in all EB-2 categories.  Here is a summary of the May 2009 Visa Bulletin:

EB-1 remains current across the board.
EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories &#8211; EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4454.html">May 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> has been released.  Unfortunately, and as expected, <u>all EB-3 categories are now &#8220;unavailable.&#8221;</u>  Also, there <u>is no movement in all EB-2 categories.</u>  Here is a summary of the May 2009 Visa Bulletin:</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 remains unchanged for all categories &#8211; EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) is current, EB-2 China remains February 15, 2005, and EB-2 India remains February 15, 2004.</li>
<li>EB-3 applicants is unavailable for all categories.</li>
<li>Other worker applicants are also unavailable.</li>
</ul>
<p xmlns:o="urn:www.microsoft.com/office" xmlns:st1="urn:www.microsoft.com/smarttags" xmlns:w="urn:www.microsoft.com/word" xmlns:x="urn:www.microsoft.com/excel">The cut-off dates for the EB-3 and “Other Worker” categories were held and then retrogressed in an effort to bring demand within the average monthly usage targets and the overall annual numerical limits.   Despite these efforts, the amount of demand received from USCIS for adjustment of status cases with priority dates that were significantly earlier than the established cut-off dates remained extremely high.  As a result, these annual limits have been reached and both categories have become “unavailable.”    Visa availability in these categories will resume in October, the first month of the new fiscal year.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/contacts">contact our</a> office and we would be happy to evaluate your case and advise on the possibility of using or refiling your case in the EB-2 category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/04/may-2009-visa-bulletin-eb-3-unavailable-eb-2-unchanged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AAO Processing Times Report</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/03/aao-processing-times-report-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/03/aao-processing-times-report-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-290B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9 months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative appeals office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multinational manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[researcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skilled worker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/03/aao-processing-times-report-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USCIS has released the average processing times for cases pending at the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as of March 18, 2009.
Among the most notable AAO processing times:

H-1B appeal takes 13 months (compared to 14 months when last reported in January 2009);
I-140 EB1 Extrordinary Ability and Multinational Manager or Executive categories both take 9 months while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USCIS has released the average processing times for cases pending at the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as of March 18, 2009.</p>
<p>Among the most notable AAO processing times:</p>
<ul>
<li>H-1B appeal takes 13 months (compared to 14 months when last reported in January 2009);</li>
<li>I-140 EB1 Extrordinary Ability and Multinational Manager or Executive categories both take 9 months while EB1 Outstanding Professor or Researcher category takes 8 months on appeal;</li>
<li>I-140 EB2 (Advanced Degree) takes 21 months while EB2 (NIW) is current (meaning less than 6 months); and</li>
<li>I-140 EB3 Skilled Worker takes 20 months while EB3 Other Worker takes 22 months on appeal;</li>
</ul>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/aao-processing-times-march-18-2009.pdf">AAO Processing Times</a> report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/03/aao-processing-times-report-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2009 Visa Bulletin &#8211; Not Much Movement</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/02/march-2009-visa-bulletin-not-much-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/02/march-2009-visa-bulletin-not-much-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attractive option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[may 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/02/march-2009-visa-bulletin-not-much-movement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The March 2009 Visa Bulletin has been released.  Unfortunately, even though there is some forward movement in some EB categories, the progress is very small.  Many important categories have not moved forward at all this month.

EB-1 remains current across the board.
EB-2 China moves forward by 45 days to February 15, 2005.  EB-2 India moves forward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4427.html">March 2009 Visa Bulletin</a> has been released.  Unfortunately, even though there is some forward movement in some EB categories, the progress is very small.  Many important categories have not moved forward at all this month.</p>
<ul>
<li>EB-1 remains current across the board.</li>
<li>EB-2 China moves forward by 45 days to <u>February 15, 2005</u>.  EB-2 India moves forward by 45 days to <u>February 15, 2004</u>.</li>
<li>EB-3 applicants, however, will be disappointed.  There is no movement in most of the categories.  EB-3 India remains <u>unchanged</u> at October 15, 2001.  EB-3 ROW (Rest of World) remains <u>unchanged</u> at May 1, 2005.  EB-3 China moves forward slightly by 22 days to <u>October 22, 2002</u>.  Finally, EB-3 Mexico moves forward significantly by 17 months to <u>March 15, 2003</u>.</li>
</ul>
<p>March&#8217;s Visa Bulletin continues to improve the EB-2 category and make it a very attractive option for many applicants.  Although this month&#8217;s EB-2 progress of 45 days is significantly less than the 6-month forward movement observed in <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/01/february-2009-visa-bulletin-some-forward-movement/">last month&#8217;s visa bulletin</a>, it seems that USCIS is making efforts to improve the efficiency of the EB-2 category.</p>
<p>In light of these visa numbers, it becomes increasingly important to be able to file under the EB-2 category and avoid the very lengthy delays of the EB-3 category.  Please <a href="http://www.cilawgroup.com/contacts">contact our</a> office and we would be happy to evaluate your case and advise on the possibility of using the EB-2 category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2009/02/march-2009-visa-bulletin-not-much-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2008 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-2 Progresses, EB-3 May Retrogress</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/08/september-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-2-progresses-eb-3-may-retrogress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/08/september-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-2-progresses-eb-3-may-retrogress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formal decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[required]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/08/september-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-2-progresses-eb-3-may-retrogress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The September 2008 Visa Bulletin has been released by the Department of State.  It brings a mix of good and bad news.
The good news for EB-2 applicants from India and China continues this month as well &#8211; the dates for EB-2 India and EB-2 China moved by two months, from June 1, 2006, to August [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html">September 2008 Visa Bulletin</a> has been released by the Department of State.  It brings a mix of good and bad news.</p>
<p>The good news for EB-2 applicants from India and China continues this month as well &#8211; the dates for EB-2 India and EB-2 China moved by two months, from June 1, 2006, to August 1, 2006.  There are no other changes to the employment-based dates.</p>
<p>However, there were some bad news for employment-based applicants in the EB-3 category.  Earlier in July, when the EB-3 category became &#8220;Unavailable&#8221; the comment was that it is expected that in October, upon the beginning of the new fiscal year, the EB-3 dates would return to their June 2008 values.  However, the State Department has revised this expectation and has indicated &#8220;the that continued heavy demand in those categories may require the establishment of cut-off dates which are earlier than those which had applied in June. &#8221; Although this backward movement is not certain yet, a formal decision is expected in September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/08/september-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-2-progresses-eb-3-may-retrogress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neufield Memo on 180-day Adjustment of Status Bar Exemption</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/neufield-memo-on-180-day-adjustment-of-status-bar-exemption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/neufield-memo-on-180-day-adjustment-of-status-bar-exemption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8 bars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjudication procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment of status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donald neufeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and nationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and nationality act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and nationality act ina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[july 14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawful admission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitioner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 245]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorized employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/neufield-memo-on-180-day-adjustment-of-status-bar-exemption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) allows for the adjustment of status (I-485) which so many of our clients and readers are well familiar.  Section 245(c) of the INA establishes eight (8) bars to adjustment of status.  However, adjustment of status based on employment-based immigrant visa are exempt from three of these bars, pursuant to Section 245(k). 

In a July 14, 2008, Memorandum, Donald Neufeld seeks to explain the applicability of these exemptions and provide details and clarifications on the applicability of the exemptions and the adjudication procedures.  Please read the full article for details on the July 14, 2008, Memorandum and analysis on its implications.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) allows for the adjustment of status (I-485) which so many of our clients and readers are well familiar.  Section 245(c) of the INA establishes eight (8) bars to adjustment of status.  However, adjustment of status based on employment-based immigrant visa are exempt from three of these bars, pursuant to Section 245(k).</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/07142008-neufield-memo-re-180-day-aos-exemption.pdf">July 14, 2008, Memorandum</a>, Donald Neufeld seeks to explain the applicability of these exemptions and provide details and clarifications on the applicability of the exemptions and the adjudication procedures.</p>
<p><strong>What is the Exemption</strong>.   The bars to admission which are inapplicable are as follows: for a period of <u>180 days</u> since the petitioner&#8217;s last <u>lawful admission</u> in the U.S. your status, (1) failed to maintain your status, (2) engaged in unauthorized employment, and (3) otherwise violated the terms of his/her status or admission.</p>
<p><strong>Who is Exempt</strong>.  The exemptions are applicable to employment-based adjustment of status applications in EB-1, EB-2, EB-3, or EB-4 categories.  The alien must be present in the U.S. pursuant to a lawful admission.  The exemptions are available to derivative petitioners as well.</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>.  Although this is not a new rule, the July 14, 2008, Neufield Memo seeks to provide clear guidance and explanation on the applicability of the 180-day exemptions.  It is important to understand that the three exemptions are <strong>only for employment-based</strong> adjustment of status petitions, and not for family-based.  Also, it is important to understand that the 180-day period is cumulative and includes all days, weekend and holidays.  Finally, the 180-day period counts the dates since the last lawful admission &#8211; leaving the U.S. and entering legally &#8220;clears&#8221; the count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/neufield-memo-on-180-day-adjustment-of-status-bar-exemption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on Limited I-140 Premium Processing</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/update-on-limited-i-140-premium-processing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/update-on-limited-i-140-premium-processing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h1b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-907]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national interest waivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premium processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/update-on-limited-i-140-premium-processing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wrote earlier about the availability of limited I-140 premium processing filings.  It is only available to certain H-1B holders who "H-out" of their status and for whom the only way to remain on H-1B status would be a I-140 premium processing filing.  

The USCIS has now commented on some of the limitations on the I-140 premium processing program and has provided some guidance and clarification on which types of I-140 are eligible for premium processing.  Please read the full article for further details.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We <a href="/2008/06/limited-i-140-premium-processing-resumes-on-june-16/">wrote earlier</a> about the availability of limited I-140 premium processing filings.  It is only available to certain H-1B holders who &#8220;H-out&#8221; of their status and for whom the only way to remain on H-1B status would be a I-140 premium processing filing.  Please read our <a href="/2008/06/limited-i-140-premium-processing-resumes-on-june-16/">earlier article for details on this</a>.</p>
<p>The USCIS has released some clarifications on the I-140 premium processing procedure.</p>
<p>First, not all cases of I-140s are eligible for premium processing.  Prior to the suspension of premium processing for I-140&#8217;s last Fall, only certain I-140 case types were eligible. For example, National Interest Waivers and Multinational Managers were not eligible for premium processing. Those case types are still not eligible for premium processing, even in an &#8220;H-out&#8221; situation.</p>
<p>Second, the I-140 premium processing is available if the beneficiary is in H-1B status in the U.S.</p>
<p>Finally, the current program is only available if the beneficiary is within 60 days of the end of the 6th year of H-1B time. The purpose of this premium processing option was to benefit those individuals who could not qualify for a one-year extension and who needed an approved I-140 to remain in the US.  It was originally assumed that the term &#8220;6th year&#8221; could be read to mean &#8220;last year&#8221; in H-1B time. However, USCIS has said that they will be taking the term &#8220;6th year&#8221; literally. Therefore, if the beneficiary is in the 7th or 8th year of H-1B time, your premium processing request may not be accepted.</p>
<p>The USCIS has received comments on these three clarifications and is working to consider, and possibly, adjust the scope of the I-140 program.  However, until USCIS releases modifications of the program, the I-140 premium processing program remains somewhat limited in scope and applicability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/update-on-limited-i-140-premium-processing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>August 2008 Visa Bulletin &#8211; Great News for EB-2 India</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/august-2008-visa-bulletin-great-news-for-eb-2-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/august-2008-visa-bulletin-great-news-for-eb-2-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department visa bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/august-2008-visa-bulletin-great-news-for-eb-2-india/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2008 Visa Bulletin is about to be released and we have reliable (based on past experience) information that EB-2 India will move forward by more than two years - from April 2004 to June 2006.

This is excellent news for applicants in the EB-2 India category.  Stay tuned as we wil update this post with more information as the official State Department Visa Bulletin is distributed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The August 2008 Visa Bulletin is about to be released and we have reliable (based on past experience) information that EB-2 India will move forward by more than two years &#8211; from April 2004 to <strong>June 2006</strong>.</p>
<p>This is excellent news for applicants in the EB-2 India category.  Stay tuned as we wil update this post with more information as the official State Department Visa Bulletin is distributed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/07/august-2008-visa-bulletin-great-news-for-eb-2-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July 2008 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB3 Unavailable; Good News for EB-3 India and China</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/06/july-2008-visa-bulletin-eb3-unavailable-good-news-for-eb-3-india-and-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/06/july-2008-visa-bulletin-eb3-unavailable-good-news-for-eb-3-india-and-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and nationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and nationality act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 2008 Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority dates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/06/july-2008-visa-bulletin-eb3-unavailable-good-news-for-eb-3-india-and-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BREAKING NEWS - The July 2008 Visa Bulletin has been released and EB-3 are unavailable while EB-3 (India and China) get additional visa numbers for the fiscal year.  Please read the full article for additional details on this breaking development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BREAKING NEWS</strong></p>
<p><strong>EB-3 Unavailable.  </strong>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4252.html">July 2008 Visa Bulletin</a> is out.  As we predicted in May, the Employment Based Third Category (EB-3) is now unavailable until the end of the Fiscal Year in October.   This means that no EB-3 cases will be approved until at least October.  It is expected that in October the EB-3 priority dates will return to their May/June level.</p>
<p><strong>Good news for EB-2 India and China.  </strong> The July 2008 Visa Bulletin, however, brings good news to EB-2 applicants from India and China.  According to Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the total demand for EB-2 visas from countries other than India and China has been insufficient to meet the number of available visas; therefore, such estimated excess numbers have been allocated to EB-2 India and China.  It is expected that because Indian nationals constitute a larger proportion of the currently pending EB-2 cases, most of the newly available EB-2 visas will go to Indian nationals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/06/july-2008-visa-bulletin-eb3-unavailable-good-news-for-eb-3-india-and-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Proposal Aims to End Concurrent I-140/I-485 Filing</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/new-proposal-aims-to-end-concurrent-i-140i-485-filing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/new-proposal-aims-to-end-concurrent-i-140i-485-filing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjustment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concurrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliminate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreigners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I140]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simultaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/new-proposal-aims-to-end-concurrent-i-140i-485-filing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USCIS is proposing to amend the regulations concerning the concurrent filing of employment-based I-140 and I-485 petitions as long as visa number is available to the alien beneficiary.  The proposed rule seeks to amend the rule so that a worker applying for I-485 adjustment of status must be the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition prior to the filing of the adjustment application. Please read the full article on the impact of the new rule and more details.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USCIS is <a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?ruleID=266737" target="_blank">proposing</a> to amend the regulations concerning the concurrent filing of employment-based I-140 and I-485 petitions as long as visa number is available to the alien beneficiary.  The proposed rule seeks to amend the rule so that a worker applying for I-485 adjustment of status must be the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition <strong>prior </strong>to the filing of the adjustment application.</p>
<p>The proposed rule is scheduled for publication in June with a 60-day comment period.</p>
<p><strong>Reasons</strong><br />
We do not have reliable information at this point as to the rationale of this proposed rule change.  It seems that USCIS may be trying to eliminate the backlog of I-140/I-485 applications which were filed in the summer of 2007 when there was a substantial forward visa movement.  It has been suggested that USCIS may be trying to control the volume of filings should a dramatic forward movement, similar to the summer of 2007, occur in the future.</p>
<p><strong>About the I-140/I-485 Concurrent Filing Procedure </strong><br />
The concurrent filing procedure was implemented in 2002 and it has become a very useful for aliens who qualify.  The concurrent filing procedure permits an alien who has an I-140 filed to file a I-485 adjustment of status application and, as a result, take advantage of a number of benefits associated with pending I-485.  A properly filed and pending I-485 opens eligibility for employment authorization documents (EAD) and advanced parole (AP) for the beneficiary and his or her immediate family.  Also, having I-485 pending for certain period of time may open other benefits, such as job portability to similar job opportunities.</p>
<p><strong>Consequences</strong><br />
As a result of the new rule, foreign employees would be impacted negatively in several important ways.  First, they would be restricted in switching employers.  Additionally, families of foreign employees would not be entitled to work authorization until later in the process, thus putting financial strain on some of the immigrant families.  Finally, international travel may be impacted as fewer families would be entitled to AP earlier in the process.</p>
<p>It should be noted that it is not expected that the proposed rule will impact currently filed concurrent I-140/I-485.  We will continue to monitor the situation and update our clients as we learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/new-proposal-aims-to-end-concurrent-i-140i-485-filing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June 2008 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB-3 Expected to Retrogress</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/june-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-3-expected-to-retrogress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/june-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-3-expected-to-retrogress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[april]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reached]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/june-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-3-expected-to-retrogress/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The June 2008 Bulletin is out.  Among the employment-based visa numbers, there is a slight forward movement in the EB-2 category for China and India, by about 3 months, from January 2004 to April 2004.  However, the June bulletin indicates that retrogression for EB-3 is expected in July.  Please read the full article for more details on the June 2008 Visa Bulletin. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The June 2008 Bulletin is out.  Among the employment-based visa numbers, there is a slight forward movement in the EB-2 category for China and India, by about 3 months, from January 2004 to April 2004.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, there was no movement in the EB-3 category for any country.  There were more bad news for EB-3 applicants.  According to the June 2008 Visa Bulletin, the annual cap for EB-3 cases is expected to be reached in June; as a result, the EB-3 category is likely to experience retrogressions or visa unavailability beginning in July (stay tuned for the July 2008 Visa Bulletin in mid-June).  It is expected that in October, upon the start of the new fiscal year, the cut-off dates would recover to their present date.</p>
<p>Read the full <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4231.html">June 2008 Visa Bulletin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/05/june-2008-visa-bulletin-eb-3-expected-to-retrogress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 2008 Visa Bulletin</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/may-2008-visa-bulletin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/may-2008-visa-bulletin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chargeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/may-2008-visa-bulletin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The May 2008 Visa Bulletin is out.  Among the employment-based visa numbers, unfortunately, there was only a slight forward movement for most categories.  The most notable movement was for employment-based third preference category (EB-3) for all countries except China, India, Mexico.  The priority date for such EB-3 workers moved from July 2005 to March 2006.  EB-3 Mexico and EB-3 Philippines moved to July 2002 and March 2006, respectively.

EB-2 China and EB-2 India moved slightly forward; unfortunately this movement was very minor, only by a month, to January 2004 for both.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The May 2008 Visa Bulletin is out.  Among the employment-based visa numbers, unfortunately, there was only a slight forward movement for most categories.  The most notable movement was for employment-based third preference category (EB-3) for all countries except China, India, Mexico.  The priority date for such EB-3 workers moved from July 2005 to March 2006.  EB-3 Mexico and EB-3 Philippines moved to July 2002 and March 2006, respectively.</p>
<p>EB-2 China and EB-2 India moved slightly forward; unfortunately this movement was very minor, only by a month, to January 2004 for both.</p>
<p>See the full <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4205.html">May 2008 Visa Bulletin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/may-2008-visa-bulletin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Report of PERM Processing and Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/dol-report-of-perm-processing-and-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/dol-report-of-perm-processing-and-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-1B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PERM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FY2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h1b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/dol-report-of-perm-processing-and-statistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor has released the PERM processing statistics for the first two quarters of its Fiscal Year 2008.  The report indicates that there were 44,090 PERM applications received, there were 12,600 cases certified and, as of March 23, 2008, there were 28,000 cases pending. Read the full article for details.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor (DOL) has released the PERM statistics for the first two quarters of its Fiscal Year (FY) 2008, covering the period between October 1, 2007, and March 31, 2008 (the &#8220;Period&#8221;).</p>
<p>During the Period, there were 44,090 PERM applications received, there were 12,600 cases certified and, as of March 23, 2008, there were 28,000 cases pending.</p>
<p>Among the highlights provided by DOL are that 66% of the <strong>certified</strong> PERM cases were H-1B workers.  The top five states of intended employment were California, New York, New Jersey, Texas, and Florida.  Among the countries, India was top, followed by China, South Korea, Philippines, Mexico, Canada, and the U.K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/04/dol-report-of-perm-processing-and-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April 2008 Visa Bulletin: Good News for EB2 India</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/april-2008-visa-bulletin-good-news-for-eb2-india/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/april-2008-visa-bulletin-good-news-for-eb2-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-485]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrogression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/april-2008-visa-bulletin-good-news-for-eb2-india/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Department just released its April 2008 Visa Bulletin and it brings some good news and relief to EB2 India applicants &#8211; the cutoff date for EB2 India has moved from &#8220;unavailable&#8221; to December 1, 2003.
See the full April 2008 Visa Bulletin.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Department just released its April 2008 Visa Bulletin and it brings some good news and relief to EB2 India applicants &#8211; the cutoff date for EB2 India has moved from &#8220;unavailable&#8221; to December 1, 2003.</p>
<p>See the full <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4177.html?css=print">April 2008 Visa Bulletin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/03/april-2008-visa-bulletin-good-news-for-eb2-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 2008 Visa Bulletin Advances Most EB3 Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/02/march-2008-visa-bulletin-advances-most-eb3-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/02/march-2008-visa-bulletin-advances-most-eb3-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[august 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category applicants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department visa bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment-based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[january 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/02/march-2008-visa-bulletin-advances-most-eb3-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The March 2008 State Department Visa Bulletin is out.  The most significant development is the EB3 &#8220;worldwide&#8221; (everyone except from China, India, Mexico and the Philippines) category applicants.
EB3 &#8211; Employment-based, Third Preference
The best news is for applicants under the EB3 category.  The cutoff date for EB3 &#8220;worldwide&#8221; category and the Philippines moved forward significantly, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3953.html">March 2008</a> State Department Visa Bulletin is out.  The most significant development is the EB3 &#8220;worldwide&#8221; (everyone except from China, India, Mexico and the Philippines) category applicants.</p>
<p><strong>EB3 &#8211; Employment-based, Third Preference</strong></p>
<p>The best news is for applicants under the EB3 category.  The cutoff date for EB3 &#8220;worldwide&#8221; category and the Philippines moved forward significantly, to January 1, 2005, an advance of more than two years.  China moved forward by more than a year, to December 1, 2002.  India moved forward by few months, to August 1, 2001.</p>
<p><strong>EB2 &#8211; Employment-based, Second Preference</strong></p>
<p>While EB2 India is still unavailable, EB2 China has moved slightly forward to December 1, 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/02/march-2008-visa-bulletin-advances-most-eb3-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EB2 India Developments from Department of State</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/eb2-india-developments-from-department-of-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/eb2-india-developments-from-department-of-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american immigration lawyers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EB-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/15/eb2-india-developments-from-department-of-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We commented recently on the EB-2 India &#8220;unavailable&#8221; February 2008 Visa Bulletin.  As expected, this development created a reason for concern not only among Indian nationals but also from nationals of other countries that the EB-2 visa numbers may become unavailable.
The American Immigration Lawyers Association has approached Charlie Oppenheim, the Chief of Immigrant Visa Control [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We <a href="http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/11/february-2008-visa-bulletin-eb2-india-is-unavailable/">commented recently</a> on the EB-2 India &#8220;unavailable&#8221; February 2008 Visa Bulletin.  As expected, this development created a reason for concern not only among Indian nationals but also from nationals of other countries that the EB-2 visa numbers may become unavailable.</p>
<p>The American Immigration Lawyers Association has approached Charlie Oppenheim, the Chief of Immigrant Visa Control and Reporting at the State Department, for comment on the EB-2 India unavailability.  In November 2007 the indications were that that demand for EB-2 India visa numbers would place significant pressure on the overall annual visa limitation, leading to rolling back the priority date for EB-2 India once for December 2007 Visa Bulletin to 01JAN02 and again for January 2008 Visa Bulletin to 01JAN00.  Even with those significant retrogressions, there was a demand for 300 EB-2 India visas in December.</p>
<p>It is possible that India EB-2 can become again available if it appears that demand for EB-1 India will not exceed the annual limit but this determination will not be possible until the second half of the fiscal year (April 08 or later).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/eb2-india-developments-from-department-of-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 2008 Visa Bulletin &#8211; EB2 India is &#8220;Unavailable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/february-2008-visa-bulletin-eb2-india-is-unavailable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/february-2008-visa-bulletin-eb2-india-is-unavailable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EB-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Alert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eb2 visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indian nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor certification backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preference category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remainder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unavailability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/11/february-2008-visa-bulletin-eb2-india-is-unavailable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Department of State issued its February 2008 monthly visa bulletin on January 9.  The February bulletin reflects that visa numbers for EB2 India (employment-based second preference category for Indian nationals) are &#8220;unavailable.&#8221;  According to the Bulletin, the annual limit has been reached in this category for India meaning that there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States Department of State issued its <a href="http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3925.html">February 2008 monthly visa bulletin</a> on January 9.  The February bulletin reflects that visa numbers for EB2 India (employment-based second preference category for Indian nationals) are &#8220;unavailable.&#8221;  According to the Bulletin, the annual limit has been reached in this category for India meaning that there are no more EB2 visa numbers for Indian nationals for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2008 which runs until September 30, 2008.</p>
<p>This visa &#8220;unavailability&#8221; was anticipated as a result of the surge in demand in this visa category.  Many foreign workers who had previously applied as EB3 (employment-based third preference)  were caught in the labor certification backlog which lasted, for some, people several years.  Many of these employees were able to refile their applications under the more attractive EB3 category due to experience they gained while waiting for labor certification approval.  As a result, the number of EB3 petitions rose sharply over the past months and quickly exhausted the number of available EB3 visas.</p>
<p>The October 2008 Visa Bulletin, due to be released in September 2008 should &#8220;open&#8221; again EB3 visas for Indian nationals.  Note that EB2 visa numbers are &#8220;current&#8221; for all other nationalities except China which is as of January 1, 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.laborimmigration.com/2008/01/february-2008-visa-bulletin-eb2-india-is-unavailable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
