Labor Immigration Law

Many of our readers and clients are aware of the recent developments with respect to the “border security bill” passed by Congress and recently signed by President Obama into law (Public Law 111-230).

What Are the New H-1B and L-1 Filing Fees?

Effective immediately, Public Law 111-230 requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after Aug. 14, 2010, and will remain in effect through Sept. 30, 2014.

Note that not all H-1B or L-1 cases are subject to these new fees.  These additional fees apply to petitioners who employ 50 or more employees in the United States with more than 50 percent of its employees in the United States in H-1B or L (including L-1A, L-1B and L-2) nonimmigrant status.  Petitioners meeting these criteria must submit the fee with an H-1B or L-1 petition filed:

• Initially to grant an alien nonimmigrant status described in subparagraph (H)(i)(b) or (L) of section 101(a)(15) (H-1B or L-1 cases), or
• To obtain authorization for an alien having such status to change employers.

It should also be noted that this additional fee, where applicable, is in addition to any applicable filing, fraud prevention, ACWIA or premium processing fees.

Revisions of Form I-129 is Underway

Because Public Law 111-230 is effective immediately but USCIS has not released a revised Form I-129 to reflect the new requirements and fees, USCIS advises all H or L filings to clearly describe whether the new fee applies:

USCIS recommends that all H-1B, L-1A and L-1B petitioners, as part of the filing packet, include the new fee or a statement of other evidence outlining why this new fee does not apply. USCIS requests that petitioners include a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter. Where USCIS does not receive such explanation and/or documentation with the initial filing, it may issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) to determine whether the petition is covered by the public law. An RFE may be required even if such evidence is submitted, if questions remain.

Source: USCIS Update: USCIS Implements H-1B and L-1 Fee Increase According to Public Law 111-230 (August 19, 2010)

Conclusion

The H-1B and L visa fee increase is likely to impact a number of companies relying heavily on foreign workers.  The law has sparked some controversy and is subject to a number of diplomatic, political and even international trade disputes.   However, as it stands now, all H-1B and L filings should undergo an additional level of analysis whether Public Law 111-230 applies.

The September 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The last visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some forward movement across all categories, with the exception of EB-3 India.

Summary of the September 2010 Visa Bulletin – Employment-Based (EB)

Below is a summary of the September 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by slightly over two (2) months to May 8, 2006, EB-2 India also moves forward by two (2) months from March 1, 2006 to May 8, 2006.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by six and a half (6.5) months to December 15, 2004, EB-3 China  moves forward by one (1) month to October 22, 2003, while EB-3 India  remains unchanged.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• The “other worker” category moves forward by a few months, to March 22, 2003 for ROW and China remains unchanged at January 1, 2002 for India.

Substantial Forward Movement Continues

The notable forward movement in EB-2 and some EB-3 categories continues in this month’s visa bulletin as well.   This significant movement is due to the fact that there are some visa numbers available from other countries have not been reached yet and such countries’ per-country limit has not been reached.  As a result, as we are getting close to the end of the fiscal year, and after taking the worldwide demand into account, the State Department is attempting to allocate all of the available visa numbers which, if not allocated, may remain unused during the fiscal year.

Forward Movement Is Temporary

We wish to reiterate that the substantial forward movement  over the past three visa bulletins does not indicate a trend; instead, the last three visa bulletins’ forward movement was to ensure that no available visa numbers remain unused due to poor allocation of the unused numbers.  We expect that there be some retrogression over the next 1-3 months.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application, should your priority date become current.

The August 2010 Visa Bulletin was just released by the State Department.  The eleventh visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.

Summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin – Employment-Based (EB)

Below is a summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by slightly over three (3) months to March 1, 2006, EB-2 India moves forward by five (5) months from October 1, 2005 to March 1, 2006.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by nine and a half months (9.5) months to June 1, 2004, EB-3 China  moves forward by slightly over one (1) month to September 22, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by slightly over one (1) month to January 1, 2002.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• The “other worker” category moves forward by a few months, to May 15, 2002 for ROW and China and to January 1, 2002 for India.

Substantial Forward Movement Continues

The notable forward movement in EB-2 and some EB-3 categories continues in this month’s visa bulletin as well.   This significant movement is due to the fact that there are some visa numbers available from other countries have not been reached yet and such countries’ per-country limit has not been reached.  As a result, as we are getting close to the end of the fiscal year, and after taking the worldwide demand into account, the State Department has determined only 8,100 of the total available EB-2 preference numbers would be used in that quarter.   In this case, the unused 3,500 numbers could then be made available to China-mainland born and India regardless of their per-country limits.

Forward Movement Is Temporary

Note that the substantial forward movement  does not indicate a trend; instead, the last two visa bulletins’ forward movement was to ensure that no available visa numbers remain unused due to poor allocation of the unused numbers.  We expect that there be some retrogression over the next 1-3 months.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application, should your priority date become current.

The Department of Labor (“DOL”) has provided an update on the current PERM processing dates as of May 31, 2010.  They are as follows:

• Regular processing: August 2009.  DOL is processing PERM applications with priority dates in August of 2009.  This suggests that there is certain forward movement for regular PERM processing.  Accordingly, regular PERM processing times should be approximately nine (9) months.
• Audited applications: May 2008.  This is no movement in this category in comparison to prior months.   Accordingly, audited PERM applications are processed approximately 24 months after the initial PERM was filed and the priority date established.
• Appealed applications: December 2007.  There is some delay in this category in comparison to prior months.   Accordingly, PERM appeals are processed approximately 29 months after the initial PERM was filed and its priority date established.

We continue monitoring the PERM processing times and analyze any updates.  Please visit us again or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to ensure that you obtain this and related immigration-related news and announcement.

We have written extensively in the past regarding the January 8, 2010 Neufeld Memo which introduced guidance requiring H-1B applications to show proof of employer-employee relationship between the H-1B petitioner and beneficiary.  The Neufeld Memo has affected mostly staffing and consulting companies where the H-1B beneficiaries are employed at third-party worksites.

USCIS Sued to Prevent Enforcement of the Neufeld Memo Guidelines

In a five-count complaint filed by a coalition of staffing companies and representative trade associations, the USCIS is asked to stop temporarily and permanently from applying the Neufeld Memo in H-1B adjudications.  The case is Broadgate v. USCIS and is assigned to Judge Kessler at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The complaint alleges that the Neufeld Memo abruptly altered long-standing agency policy which has permitted companies from placing H-1B workers at third-party job sites.  The complaint further alleges that existing USCIS guidelines specify that an employer-employee relationship does exists when the petitioner company may “hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of any such employee.”  The plaintiffs in this case claim that the Neufeld Memo constitutes a legislative regulation because it sets forth new binding standards that prevent employers that place employees at third-party worksites, but which otherwise meet the regulatory definition, from sponsoring H-1B nonimmigrants.

The complaint alleges that the new policy (i) is contrary to existing law and regulations, (ii) is arbitrary and capricious because the government failed to articulate a policy justification, (iii) violates the Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements, and (iv) should have been issued following a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (which requires regulators to consider the potential impact of regulations on small business).

Conclusion: More to Follow

Our office has been very involved in this issue from the publication of the Neufeld Memo and we have seen the impact of the memo on H-1B adjudications and RFEs.   USCIS has been under some pressure to amend the Neufeld Memo, at least in some respects, and this lawsuit is certain to put more pressure on resolving this controversy.  We will continue monitoring this case and the Neufeld Memo developments coming out of USCIS and will provide updates.  In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.

The July 2010 Visa Bulletin was released earlier this afternoon by the State Department.  The tenth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings some substantial forward movement in the EB-2 India category which had not moved for the past few months.  Also, there is some gradual forward across all EB-3 employment-based categories.

Summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin

Below is a summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China remains unchanged at November 22, 2005, and, most notably, EB-2 India moves forward by ten (10) months from February 1, 2005 to October 1, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, EB-3 China also moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by one (1) month to November 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is  unavailable.

Finally Movement in EB-2 India

Previously we wrote about the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category for the past four months.  Finally, there is a substantial forward movement in EB-2 India which should benefit at least some of our clients and readers.  Please do not hesitate us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application.

The June  2010 Visa Bulletin was released earlier today by the State Department.  The ninth visa bulletin for the fiscal year 2010 brings gradual forward across most employment-based categories except EB-2 India (no change this month, for the third month in a row).

The State Department added another country to the list of oversubscribed countries – Dominican Republic.  This means that for all family and employment-based categories, there is now a category for the Dominican Republic, in addition to China (mainland-born), India, Mexico and the Philippines.

Summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin

Below is a summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (2) months to November 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1, 2005.  This is the third month in a row when EB-2 India has remained unchanged.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to June 22, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by two (2) months to June 22,  2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by three (3) weeks to October 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is now unavailable.

Why Does EB-2 India Not Move?

Our readers and clients have asked us what is the cause of the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category.  Over the past few years, with the severe retrogression of EB-3 India, many Indian nationals have been able to start and obtain an approval of a new I-140 under the EB-2 category.  Our office has handled a number of such EB-3 to EB-2 “upgrade” cases.  As a result, many of the EB-3 India applicants are now EB-2 India applicants, resulting in delay in the movement of EB-2 India priority dates.   We would be happy to analyze your EB-3 case and help you if you can “port” it to EB-2 – please contact us for a free initial consultation.

USCIS released the weekly FY2011 information on the numbers of cap-subject H-1Bs filed since April 1.  As of April 22, 2010, USCIS has received approximately 16,025 H-1B petitions counting toward the 65,000 cap (a weekly increase of 2,425). Similarly, as of April 22, there were 6,739 H-1B visas filed subject to the U.S. Masters cap which has 20,000 limit (a weekly increase of only 939).

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past three weeks – indicate that after there was a very small weekly increase in the number of H-1B filings two weeks ago, last week the number of H-1B filings have increased.   As a result, although it is early to draw reliable long-term conclusions, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will remain open for a considerable time.

We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics.  In the meantime, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2011 quota, please contact us as soon as possible — it is never too early to file a cap-subject H-1B petition.

Our office has fielded numerous calls from a number of foreign nationals who are in the U.S. temporarily and whose departure plans have been disrupted by the infamous Icelandic volcano ash.  For many in the U.S. whose departure travel arrangements were closely related to their I-94 expiration date, the disruption and delay in departure travel plans has caused overstay of the authorized period of stay in the U.S. on the I-94 or I-94W cards.  It is important to note that future admissibility can be permanently impacted due to an overstay of a period of authorized admission to the U.S.

Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Travelers

Overstay of the period noted on the I-94W card may make one a VWP traveler ineligible for future travel to the U.S. under VWP and require visa application for future travel.   For those in the U.S. under the VWP, contact the CBP airport office or the nearest U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office. There will be a few travelers with no I-94W under the pilot paperless I-94W project.   There is a passenger service manager list for international airports.

Per relevant regulations, 8 CFR § 217.3:

Satisfactory departure: If an emergency prevents an alien admitted under this part from departing from the United States within his or her period of authorized stay, the district director having jurisdiction over the place of the alien’s temporary stay may, in his or her discretion, grant a period of satisfactory departure not to exceed 30 days. If departure is accomplished during that period, the alien is to be regarded as having satisfactorily accomplished the visit without overstaying the allotted time.

Travelers on Nonimmigrant Visas

For those in the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa, CBP directs them to apply for an extension of nonimmigrant status. Even though an I-539 extension is normally recommended to be filed 45 days before expiration, CBP notes that some arrangement regarding this point has been made. Of course, the I-539 extension filing fee is $300. At present, it is not clear whether the satisfactory departure option is available for VWP or nonimmigrant visa holders unable to depart the U.S. due to the effects of the volcano.

In a USCIS alert regarding the situation, travelers on nonimmigrant visas are advised to to either (1) visit the local USCIS office and bring passport, cancelled flight itinerary and I-94 card or (2) apply for an extension of status as soon as possible by filing Form I-539.