Summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin – Employment-Based (EB)

Below is a summary of the August 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW (Rest of World) remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by slightly over three (3) months to March 1, 2006, EB-2 India moves forward by five (5) months from October 1, 2005 to March 1, 2006.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by nine and a half months (9.5) months to June 1, 2004, EB-3 China  moves forward by slightly over one (1) month to September 22, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by slightly over one (1) month to January 1, 2002.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• The “other worker” category moves forward by a few months, to May 15, 2002 for ROW and China and to January 1, 2002 for India.

Substantial Forward Movement Continues

The notable forward movement in EB-2 and some EB-3 categories continues in this month’s visa bulletin as well.   This significant movement is due to the fact that there are some visa numbers available from other countries have not been reached yet and such countries’ per-country limit has not been reached.  As a result, as we are getting close to the end of the fiscal year, and after taking the worldwide demand into account, the State Department has determined only 8,100 of the total available EB-2 preference numbers would be used in that quarter.   In this case, the unused 3,500 numbers could then be made available to China-mainland born and India regardless of their per-country limits.

Forward Movement Is Temporary

Note that the substantial forward movement  does not indicate a trend; instead, the last two visa bulletins’ forward movement was to ensure that no available visa numbers remain unused due to poor allocation of the unused numbers.  We expect that there be some retrogression over the next 1-3 months.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application, should your priority date become current.

• Regular processing: August 2009.  DOL is processing PERM applications with priority dates in August of 2009.  This suggests that there is certain forward movement for regular PERM processing.  Accordingly, regular PERM processing times should be approximately nine (9) months.
• Audited applications: May 2008.  This is no movement in this category in comparison to prior months.   Accordingly, audited PERM applications are processed approximately 24 months after the initial PERM was filed and the priority date established.
• Appealed applications: December 2007.  There is some delay in this category in comparison to prior months.   Accordingly, PERM appeals are processed approximately 29 months after the initial PERM was filed and its priority date established.

We continue monitoring the PERM processing times and analyze any updates.  Please visit us again or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to ensure that you obtain this and related immigration-related news and announcement.

USCIS Sued to Prevent Enforcement of the Neufeld Memo Guidelines

In a five-count complaint filed by a coalition of staffing companies and representative trade associations, the USCIS is asked to stop temporarily and permanently from applying the Neufeld Memo in H-1B adjudications.  The case is Broadgate v. USCIS and is assigned to Judge Kessler at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The complaint alleges that the Neufeld Memo abruptly altered long-standing agency policy which has permitted companies from placing H-1B workers at third-party job sites.  The complaint further alleges that existing USCIS guidelines specify that an employer-employee relationship does exists when the petitioner company may “hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of any such employee.”  The plaintiffs in this case claim that the Neufeld Memo constitutes a legislative regulation because it sets forth new binding standards that prevent employers that place employees at third-party worksites, but which otherwise meet the regulatory definition, from sponsoring H-1B nonimmigrants.

The complaint alleges that the new policy (i) is contrary to existing law and regulations, (ii) is arbitrary and capricious because the government failed to articulate a policy justification, (iii) violates the Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements, and (iv) should have been issued following a certification under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (which requires regulators to consider the potential impact of regulations on small business).

Conclusion: More to Follow

Our office has been very involved in this issue from the publication of the Neufeld Memo and we have seen the impact of the memo on H-1B adjudications and RFEs.   USCIS has been under some pressure to amend the Neufeld Memo, at least in some respects, and this lawsuit is certain to put more pressure on resolving this controversy.  We will continue monitoring this case and the Neufeld Memo developments coming out of USCIS and will provide updates.  In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.

Summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin

Below is a summary of the July 2010 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China remains unchanged at November 22, 2005, and, most notably, EB-2 India moves forward by ten (10) months from February 1, 2005 to October 1, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, EB-3 China also moves forward by almost two (2) months to August 15, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by one (1) month to November 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is  unavailable.

Finally Movement in EB-2 India

Previously we wrote about the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category for the past four months.  Finally, there is a substantial forward movement in EB-2 India which should benefit at least some of our clients and readers.  Please do not hesitate us if you have any questions or if we can help you prepare and file your I-485 adjustment application.

The State Department added another country to the list of oversubscribed countries – Dominican Republic.  This means that for all family and employment-based categories, there is now a category for the Dominican Republic, in addition to China (mainland-born), India, Mexico and the Philippines.

Summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin

Below is a summary of the June 2010 Visa Bulletin:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (2) months to November 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1, 2005.  This is the third month in a row when EB-2 India has remained unchanged.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to June 22, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by two (2) months to June 22,  2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by three (3) weeks to October 22, 2001.  EB-3 Mexico remains unavailable.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is now unavailable.

Why Does EB-2 India Not Move?

Our readers and clients have asked us what is the cause of the lack of movement in the EB-2 India category.  Over the past few years, with the severe retrogression of EB-3 India, many Indian nationals have been able to start and obtain an approval of a new I-140 under the EB-2 category.  Our office has handled a number of such EB-3 to EB-2 “upgrade” cases.  As a result, many of the EB-3 India applicants are now EB-2 India applicants, resulting in delay in the movement of EB-2 India priority dates.   We would be happy to analyze your EB-3 case and help you if you can “port” it to EB-2 – please contact us for a free initial consultation.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past three weeks – indicate that after there was a very small weekly increase in the number of H-1B filings two weeks ago, last week the number of H-1B filings have increased.   As a result, although it is early to draw reliable long-term conclusions, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will remain open for a considerable time.

We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics.  In the meantime, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2011 quota, please contact us as soon as possible — it is never too early to file a cap-subject H-1B petition.

Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Travelers

Overstay of the period noted on the I-94W card may make one a VWP traveler ineligible for future travel to the U.S. under VWP and require visa application for future travel.   For those in the U.S. under the VWP, contact the CBP airport office or the nearest U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office. There will be a few travelers with no I-94W under the pilot paperless I-94W project.   There is a passenger service manager list for international airports.

Per relevant regulations, 8 CFR § 217.3:

Satisfactory departure: If an emergency prevents an alien admitted under this part from departing from the United States within his or her period of authorized stay, the district director having jurisdiction over the place of the alien’s temporary stay may, in his or her discretion, grant a period of satisfactory departure not to exceed 30 days. If departure is accomplished during that period, the alien is to be regarded as having satisfactorily accomplished the visit without overstaying the allotted time.

Travelers on Nonimmigrant Visas

For those in the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa, CBP directs them to apply for an extension of nonimmigrant status. Even though an I-539 extension is normally recommended to be filed 45 days before expiration, CBP notes that some arrangement regarding this point has been made. Of course, the I-539 extension filing fee is $300. At present, it is not clear whether the satisfactory departure option is available for VWP or nonimmigrant visa holders unable to depart the U.S. due to the effects of the volcano.

In a USCIS alert regarding the situation, travelers on nonimmigrant visas are advised to to either (1) visit the local USCIS office and bring passport, cancelled flight itinerary and I-94 card or (2) apply for an extension of status as soon as possible by filing Form I-539.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past two weeks – as of April 8th and as of April 15th, indicate that there was a very small increase in the number of H-1B filings over the past week.  As a result, although it is early to draw reliable long-term conclusions, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will remain open for a considerable time.

We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics.  In the meantime, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2011 quota, please contact us as soon as possible — it is never too early to file a cap-subject H-1B petition.

Here is a summary of the May 2010 Visa Bulletin:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (1) month to September 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1, 2005.  This is the second month in a row when EB-2 India has remained unchanged.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost three (3) months to April 22, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by almost (3) months to April 22,  2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by three (3) weeks to October 1, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001 with the exception of Mexico which is now unavailable.

Today, USCIS released the first “official” FY2011 information on the numbers of cap-subject H-1Bs filed since April 1 for both the Vermont and California Service Centers.  As of April 8, 2010, USCIS has received approximately 13,500 H-1B petitions counting toward the 65,000 cap.   This count means that as of April 8, there are 51,500 H-1B visas left under this year’s H-1B quota and USCIS will continue to accept petitions subject to the general (regular) cap.

Similarly, as of April 8, there were 5,600 H-1B visas filed subject to the U.S. Masters cap (which has 20,000 limit).  This means that as of April 8, there are approximately 14,400 visas left under the U.S. Masters H-1B cap.

H-1B Quota Trends

Throughout every H-1B cap filing season, we provide timely updates on the H-1B numbers and we draw predictions and conclusions based on the numbers and our experience.  So early in the process for this year, it is impossible to draw any trends; however, stay tuned for more numbers and updated trends over the next days and weeks.  You may want to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics.

In the meantime, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2011 quota, please contact us as soon as possible — it is never too early to file a cap-subject H-1B petition.

Note that this information is for the Vermont Service Center.  The California Service Center, the second service center processing cap-subject H-1B petitions has not announced any numbers yet. 

H-1B Quota Trends

Throughout every H-1B cap filing season, we provide timely updates on the H-1B numbers and we draw predictions and conclusions based on the numbers and our experience.  So early in the process for this year, and especially without the California Service Center numbers, it is impossible to draw any trends; however, stay tuned for more numbers and updated trends over the next days and weeks.

In the meantime, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2011 quota, please contact us as soon as possible — it is never too early to file a cap-subject H-1B petition.

Here is a summary of the April 2010 Visa Bulletin:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by six (6) weeks to August 22, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at February 1, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost fix (6) weeks to February 1, 2003, EB-3 China moves forward also by six (6) weeks to February 1, 2003, while EB-3 India moves forward by over two (2) months to September 8, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.

The VWP will enable citizens of Greece to travel to the United States, beginning on April 10, 2010, for 90 days or less for tourism or business purposes without a visa, provided they have an e-passport and an approved authorization via the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA).

Currently, 35 countries participate in the Visa Waiver Program. The U.S. Congress authorized DHS in August 2007 to reform the VWP and strengthen the security arrangements required of existing participant countries, as well as to expand the opportunity for aspiring countries to join the program. This legislation also mandates certain improvements to the VWP for all participating countries, such as the requirement that travelers first obtain an online authorization to travel under the recently established ESTA, a web-based system that determines the preliminary eligibility of visitors to travel under the VWP prior to boarding a carrier to the United States.

Anticipating reaction from practitioners and affected individuals, AILA has attempted to clarify this comment with VSC. VSC has clarified this statement. In the VSC’s view, the “credit” for RFES is meant to encourage qualitative RFES. Under the previous policy, VSC was concerned that since examiners were not given “credit” for RFES, examiners were not spending the appropriate amount of time on them, resulting in RFES that were not appropriate. According to VSC, the purpose of giving credit is to improve the quality of RFES by making it something adjudicators have to stop and think about, rather than something to quickly send off. VSC has indicated that the amount of RFES issued has not changed as a result of the policy change.

Inevitably, this comment will trigger a fair amount of speculation and, possibly, accusations that RFES are being issued unfairly. We cannot confirm that RFES are unfair or issued disproportionately; our recent experience indicates that VSCS RFES are fair and well-prepared. We will continue to monitor RFES coming out of VSC and provide updates to our clients and readers.

About the H-1B Program and the Annual Cap

The H-1B visa category was created in 1990 through the Nationality and Immigration Act of 1990 (INA).  Upon the creation of the H-1B visa type,  INA imposed a numerical limitation (“cap”) on the number of H-1Bs that could be issued in each fiscal year.  This “cap” (or quota) has varied over the past years but is set to 65,000 per year for FY2011 starting on October 1, 2010.

H-1B is a nonimmigrant visa classification used by U.S. employers to hire a foreign national who will be employed temporarily in the U.S. in a specialty occupation (generally one which requires a bachelor’s degree or higher) or as a fashion model.  Each year, by law, USCIS can approve up to new 65,000 H-1Bs, thereby allowing many private and employers to hire temporary qualified workers.   H-1B non-immigrants who work at (but not necessarily for) universities and non-profit research facilities are excluded from the numerical cap (see below for discussion of cap-exempt employers).

There are certain exceptions to the congressionally-mandated maximum of 65,000 H-1B visas per fiscal year.  The first 20,000 H1B visas issued to alien workers who obtained their master’s degree from a U.S. university are exempt from the 65,000 cap;  H1B visas issued to such U.S. master degree holders subsequent to the first 20,000 are then counted against the overall 65,000 cap.    Additionally, the cap does not apply to foreign nationals in the U.S. who are in lawful H1B status and who are seeking to extend their visa or change employers.

Timing of the Cap-subject H-1B Petition Filing

The earliest date on which cap-subject H-1B petitions to be counted under the FY2011 H-1B cap is April 1, 2010.  By law, the earliest starting employment date for petitions approved under the FY2011 H-1B cap is October 1, 2010.  As a result of this up to 6-month window  between the time of filing and the time of employment, it becomes important to plan properly with respect to resources, valid status in the U.S. and work authorization.

Before an H-1B petition can be filed on or after April 1, there are a number of lead-time items.   Employers who have not submitted Labor Condition Applications (LCAs) with the Department of Labor’s iCERT system must have their Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) verified – a process which generally takes 2-4 business days.  Subsequently, an LCA must be filed for the offered position.  LCAS tend to be certified within 7 business days.   Only after the LCA is certified (with very minor exceptions) can an H-1B petition can be finalized and filed.  Accordingly, it becomes important to start the H-1B petition process as early as possible.  At a very minimum, an H-1B petition preparation can take at least two (2) and often at least three (3) weeks.

Cap-exempt Employers Can File H-1B at Any Time

Not all H-1B petitions must be filed under the H-1B annual cap.  Certain employers can file for H-1B workers at any time of the year and without being subject to the numerical H-1B visa limitations.  Such employers are generally qualified institutions of higher education (universities, colleges) and non-profit research organizations, or non-profits affiliated with institutions of higher education.   Note, not all non-profit organizations qualify; only those who are engaged in research may file for cap-exempt H-1B petitions.

Please see our helpful Guide to H-1B Cap Exempt Employers for more details.

Projections About This Year’s H-1B Cap

As discussed above, the H-1B cap “opens” on April 1, 2010 and will remain open for new H-1B filings until the 65,000 H-1B limit is reached.  While it is impossible to predict exactly when the FY2011 H-1B cap will be reached, it is helpful to provide some context.  For FY2009, filing made on or after April 1, 2008, caused the H-1B cap to be reached in eight (8) days.   Last year, for FY2010, the H-1B cap was open between April 1, 2009 and December 22, 2009.

Due to the recovering economy, we do not expect that this year’s H-1B cap will be reached in eight days.  However, we do not anticipate that the H-1B cap will remain open until December of 2010.  Accordingly, to eliminate uncertainty, we recommend to our clients to aim for an early April H-1B filing.

Throughout the H-1B filing season, we provide weekly (or more often, if necessary) updates about the status of the H-1B cap and any related developments.  Please check back often or subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter to receive news and updates related to the H-1B filing season.

Conclusion

Because USCIS received more applications than there were visas available for fiscal years 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 within a few days of the cap opening, and for the 2010 fiscal year the cap was hit in December 2009, we recommend that clients consider their needs as soon as possible and be prepared to file on the first available date – April 1, 2010.    Our attorneys and professionals stand ready to review your case, as part of our free initial consultation, and will help you prepare a strong H-1B application.

Here is a summary of the March 2010 Visa Bulletin:

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by six (6) weeks to July 8, 2005, and EB-2 India, moves forward by only one (1) week to February 1, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost three (3) months to December 15, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by almost three (3) months also to December 15, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by only one (1) week to July 1, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.

Background

Starting in December of 2009, our office has been receiving alerts from current and prospective clients about a number of incidents where holders of valid H-1B stamps were questioned and, in some cases, offered the opportunity to withdraw their request for admission into the U.S. or be subject to expedited removal proceedings;  in many cases, such H-1B holders were not admitted into the U.S. and sent back to their home country and have had their H-1B visas cancelled.

Due to the lack of information from CBP and the seriousness of the situation, a number of misleading and sometimes false rumors have began circulating among communities of H-1B holders on the Internet.    We hope that this alert will provide helpful information and understanding of what happens at Newarj, NJ airport and what can be done about it.

USCIS/ICE Employer Fraud Investigations Cause Scrutiny of H-1B Employees

CBP has confirmed that at least several of these cases involved companies which were under investigation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and/or USCIS for ongoing H-1B program fraud.  CBP noted that they use as much advance information as possible to target specific individuals who warrant additional inspection.  CBP also noted that recent enforcement cases reviewed ranged from simple documentary deficiency to visa/petition fraud. Upon an inadmissibility finding, the determination to either allow the applicant to withdraw his or her application for admission or to subject the applicant to expedited removal is based on “the totality of the circumstances and reviewed on a case by case basis.”

In the Newark enforcement actions, CBP Newark worked closely with USCIS – Fraud Detection and National Security (“FDNS”) and the Department of Labor – Office of Investigations.  CBP stated that those questioned were offered the opportunity to contact their consulate and that CBP officers contacted the petitioner and/or current employer when clarification was needed.  CBP confirmed that they screen ALL employment-based visa holders to determine admissibility and ensure compliance with entry requirements.

Newark, NJ Airport New Policy to Verify L-1 and H-1B Employees

CBP has also announced that the Newark, New Jersey airport has instituted a new policy which involves conducting random checks for returning H-1B, L-1, and other employment-based visa holders.  Based upon the initial check, if the person’s admissibility is questionable, then he or she will be sent to secondary inspection for further interview. In some cases, if CBP discovers discrepancies in previously filed petitions, then the applicant may be asked to withdraw his/her application for admission into the United States or be subject to expedited removal.

Public Information May be Consulted During or After Inspection

Employers should be advised that the government may review information in any public venues such as websites and other media for consistency with petition content. Thus, keeping such public information accurate and current is essential.

Note the new fraud related language added to I-797 approval notices –

NOTICE: Although this application/petition has been approved, DHS reserves the right to verify the information submitted in this application, petition, and/or supporting documentation to ensure conformity with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and other authorities. Methods used for verifying information may include, but are not limited to, the review of public information and records, contact by correspondence, the Internet, or telephone, and site inspections of businesses and residences. Information obtained during the course of verification will be used to determine whether revocation, rescission, and/or removal proceedings are appropriate. Applicants, petitioners, and representatives of record will be provided an opportunity to address derogatory information before any formal proceeding is initiated.

Conclusion: Proper Pre-Travel Preparation is Essential

It should be noted that although the recent news were linked with Newark, New Jersey airport, CBP may expand its policy and enforcement to other airports at any time.  In light of these developments, it becomes increasingly important for holders of H-1B and L-1 visas to prepare well for their return trip into the U.S., regardless of the port of entry they use to enter the U.S.

We advise all of our clients to thoroughly prepare for their trip to the U.S. and their inspection upon application for admission.  H-1B and L-1 visa holders should review all pertinent documents to their petition and to consider carrying evidence to support the assertions made in the petition filed on their behalf by their employer.  In addition, the H-1B or L-1 employers must be prepared for telephone inquiries from CBP officers at ports of entry to confirm the assertions made in any nonimmigrant petition and supporting documentation.  Finally, employers should ensure that public information, such as websites and/or other materials, may be consulted by CBP agents to determine whether a particular H-1B or L-1 petition is valid.

In November of 2009, USCIS agreed to temporarily (for a period of 120 days) create a policy in line with the USCIS Ombudsman’s recommendations.   In a Memorandum dated as of January 28, 2010, by Alejandro Mayorkas addressed to the USCIS Ombudsman, USCIS announces that it will make permanent policy changes in line with the October 2009 Ombudsman recommendations.

USCIS Will Accept H-1B Petition With Evidence of Initial LCA Filing

H-1B petitions will be accepted with evidence of initial LCA filing if the H-1B has been filed at least 7 calendar days after the LCA was filed with DOL.   The petitioner must include a copy of the LCA submission’s email confirmation as evidence.

Petitioners who seek to use this H-1B filing procedure must wait until they receive an RFE before they can submit the already DOL-certified LCA in support of the H-1B filing.  The certified LCA must be the same LCA which was filed with the original H-1B petition, unless the petitioner provides an LCA which was certified prior to the submission of the H-1B petition.

Late Filings Due to LCA/FEIN Verification Delays Should Be Excused

In addition, USCIS has confirmed that it will continue to excuse late H-1B filings under 8 C.F.R. 214.1(c)(4) or 8 C.F.R. 248.1(b) when the delay in filing of the H-1B petition requesting an extension of H-1B stay or change of status to H-1B was related to LCA issuance delays beyond the control of the petitioner and/or denials by DOL due to employer’s FEIN verification issues.

AILA Seeks Rescission of the Neufeld Memorandum

Our office has revised its standard H-1B preparation guidelines for third-party worksite H-1B petitions to comply, to the extent possible, with the new requirements imposed by the Neufeld Memorandum.  In the meantime, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), in a January 26, 2010, Memorandum addressed to the Chief Counsel of USCIS, calls for the rescission of the Neufeld Memorandum effective immediately and for the issuance of a new memorandum to redefine the employer-employee relationship differently, considering legal precedent.

The AILA Memo is quite lengthy (24 pages) and goes into a great detail to substantiate its main claims that (1) the Neufeld Memorandum improperly creates substantive new rule outside the proper channel for making such rules and (2) that the employer-employee relationship definition in the Neufeld Memorandum is improper and is against congressional intent.

The Neufeld Memorandum is Improper Rulemaking

As an initial matter, AILA argues that the Neufeld Memorandum is issued improperly  because it seeks to change substantive rules without the necessary process.  Change in substantive rules must be done by following the required notice and comment procedures.  AILA argues that the “guidance” in the Neufeld Memorandum is a substantive rule change which cannot be imposed by a memorandum;  instead it should follow the normal rulemaking process.  As a result, AILA argues that the Neufeld Memorandum should be set aside as a violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

The Neufeld Memorandum Definition of Employer-Employee Relationship is Incorrect

As its main argument for seeking the rescission of the Neufeld Memorandum, AILA argues that the sweeping definition of “employer” is inconsistent with the law, impedes its intent and purpose and is inconsistent with decades of precedent.  The AILA Memo then goes into great detail and legal analysis of its claim to conclude that the Neufeld Memorandum, in addition to certain recent AAO’s non-precedent decisions and the accompanying adjudications at the Service Centers that are applying these decisions to current filings seek to overturn over fifty years of consistent precedent and regulatory interpretation to categorically deny eligibility for benefits to an entire class.

Conclusion

The AILA Memorandum is a well researched and substantiated request for the rescission of the Neufeld Memorandum.  However, we do not know yet what USCIS’ position would be in response and whether USCIS will take any steps in response to this memorandum.  We will continue to provide updates on this topic as it is of great interest of our clients, readers and a large portion of the employment-based immigration community.

ESTA is an electronic travel authorization that all citizens of VWP countries must obtain prior to boarding a carrier to travel by air or sea to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (WVP). ESTA has been mandatory since Jan. 12, 2009 for all nationals of VWP countries traveling to the U.S under the VWP. The requirement does not affect U.S. citizens returning from overseas or citizens of VWP countries traveling on a valid U.S. visa.

ESTA applications may be submitted at any time prior to travel, and once approved, generally will be valid for up to two years or until the applicant’s passport expires, whichever comes first. Authorizations are valid for multiple entries into the U.S. The Department of Homeland Security recommends that ESTA applications be submitted as soon as an applicant begins making travel plans.

VWP travelers are required to log onto the ESTA Web site and complete an online application. The web-based system prompts applicants to answer basic biographic and eligibility questions typically requested on a paper I-94W form; ESTA is expected to completely replace the paper I-94W in the coming months. A third party, such as a relative, a friend, or a travel agent, may submit an application on behalf of a VWP traveler.

ESTA Registration Mandatory – New Enforcement Campaign

We have written in the past about the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) which became mandatory more than one year ago, on January 12, 2009, for all Visa Waiver Program (VWP) travelers into the U.S.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has recently announced a 60-day campaign to enforce ESTA registration.  Pursuant to this campaign, DHS will use its authority to deny entry to all VWP travelers to U.S. who have not registered with ESTA.   Beginning January 20, CBP will initiate a 60-day transition to enforce ESTA compliance for air carriers; VWP travelers without an approved ESTA may not be allowed to board a U.S.-bound plane.

• Regular processing: March 2009.  DOL is processing PERM applications with priority dates in March of 2009.  This suggests that there is certain forward movement for regular PERM processing.  Accordingly, regular PERM processing times should be approximately nine (9) months.
• Audited applications: December 2007.  This is movement forward of two (2) months in comparison to the November 31, 2009 report, resulting a net additional gain of one (1) month for audited PERM applications.  Accordingly, audited PERM processing times should be approximately 24 months.
• Appealed applications: August 2007.  There is no movement this month in this category in comparison to November 31, 2009, resulting a net additional delay of one (1) month for appealed PERM applications.  Accordingly, PERM appeals take approximately 28 months.

We continue monitoring the PERM processing times and analyze any updates.  Please visit us again or subscribe to our free weekly newsletter to ensure that you obtain this and related immigration-related news and announcement.

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by three (3) weeks to May 22, 2005, and EB-2 India, again, remains unchanged at January 22, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by almost two (2) months to September 22, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by almost two (2) months also to September 22, 2002, while EB-3 India remains unchanged.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001.

No New FY2010 Cap-Subject H-1B Filings Accepted

USCIS will reject all cap-subject petitions for new H-1B specialty occupation workers seeking an employment start date in FY2010 that are received after December 21, 2009.  For those petitions received on December 21, 2009, USCIS will apply a computer-generated random selection process.

H-1B Quota – Last Day(s)

The numbers, as reported indicate that the H-1B cap will close within one or two days.  As a result, we are not be able to take any new FY2010 H-1B cases.  Please contact us if you would like us to help you obtain an H-1B under the FY2011 quota which is set to open on April 1, 2010.

About DS-160

The DS-160 application form combines all information previously collected on the DS-156, 157, and 158 for appropriate applicants, and the DS-3052. Applicants for “E” class treaty trader NIVs will complete the DS-160 and have to fill out a hard copy DS-156E until the DS-160E electronic form is fielded in the near future. Until further notice, K visa applicants should continue to use the DS-156 and DS-156K instead of the DS-160.

Timeline of Worldwide Rollout

The rollout will be in two main phases.  First phase posts must adopt the DS-160 prior to March 1, 2010, for all applicants, with the exception of K’s.   Those posts are Algiers, Algeria; Vienna, Austria; Manama, Bahrain; Minsk, Belarus; Beijing, China; Chengdu, China; Guangzhou, China; Shanghai, China; Shenyang, China; Havana, Cuba; Djibouti, Djibouti; Cairo, Egypt; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Paris, France; Frankfurt, Germany; Chennai, India; Hyderabad, India; Kolkata, India; Mumbai, India; Delhi, India; Jakarta, Indonesia; Surabaya, Indonesia; Tel Aviv, Israel; Jerusalem; Amman, Jordan; Nairobi, Kenya; Kuwait City, Kuwait; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

All remaining posts not listed above should implement the DS-160 between March 1, and April 30, 2010 for all applicants, with the exception of Ks.

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China moves forward by one (1) month to May 1, 2005, and EB-2 India remains unchanged at January 22, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW moves forward by two (2) months to August 1, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by two (2) months to August 1, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by almost two (2) months to June 22, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001, except for India which moves forward by one month to June 1, 2001.

USCIS released updated information on the numbers of cap-subject H-1Bs filed since April 1.  As of December 10, 2009, USCIS has received approximately 62,500 H-1B petitions counting toward the 65,000 cap (an increase of 1,000 in the past three days).   The updated count means that as of December 10, 2009, there were 2,500 H-1B visas left under this year’s H-1B quota and USCIS will continue to accept petitions subject to the general cap.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota – One Week Remaining?

The numbers, as reported over the past few weeks and days indicate that there was a notable increase in the H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will be reached in approximately one week.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota – Last Call for Filing

The numbers, as reported over the past few weeks indicate that there was a notable increase in the H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will be reached one or two weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past few weeks indicate that there was a notable increase in the H-1B filings.  As we previously reported, there has been an increase of about 900-1,300 H-1B visas for each of the past five weeks, in addition to this week’s increase of 2,000 H-1B visas.  Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable weekly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will be reached within a 3-5 weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past few weeks indicate that there was a notable increase in the H-1B filings.  As we previously reported, there was an increase of about 900 H-1B visas for each of the past four weeks, in addition to this week’s increase of 1,300 H-1B visas.  Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable weekly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will be reached within 6-7 weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

If you are planning to submit a DV-2011 entry, please do so well before the deadline because the website may become overloaded as the deadline approaches and some applicants may not be able to submit their entry in a timely manner.

More information about this year’s DV lottery.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past three weeks – as of October 30th, as of November 6th, and as of November 13th, indicate that there was a notable increase in the H-1B filings.  As we previously reported, there was an increase of about 6,100 in the number of H-1B petitions, between September 25, 2009 and October 25, 2009.  Similarly, there was an increase of 1,000 between October 25, 2009 and October 30, 2009, there was an increase of 900 between October 30, 2009, and November 6, 2009 and now there was another increase of 900 H-1B visas between November 7, 2009 and November 13, 2009.  Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable monthly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will  be reached within 8-9 weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

Background About the Required Vaccinations

Under Section 212(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), any alien who seeks admission into the United States as an immigrant, or who seeks adjustment of status to the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, is inadmissible into the United States if the alien is unable to present documentation of having received vaccination against “vaccine-preventable diseases, which shall include at least the following diseases: Mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and hepatitis B, and any other vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.”  Current guidance by the Center of Disease Control (“CDC”) includes the HPV vaccin to the list of vaccine-preventable diseases and is therefore required by girls and women between the ages of 11 and 26 who are seeking to become legal permanent US residents.  Those within this age range were required to get at least the first dose of the HPV vaccine, which protects against some strains of the virus blamed for cervical cancer. Additionally, the Gardasil shot was added to the vaccine list for immigrants in July 2008 by the CDC.

HPV Vaccine Requirement Controversy 

While HPV remains the single most widespread sexually transmitted disease in the country, only a small percentage of those infected with the virus will go on to develop life-threatening diseases like cervical cancer. The cost-effectiveness of the Gardasil vaccine (the HPV vaccine) remains largely in debate especially when young girls coming from a variety of foreign nationalities and cultures have to be subjected to medical exam and vaccination.  Additionally, the price of the vaccine, which is administered in three separate shots, can cost anywhere from $400 to $1000  (and the cost is often not reimbursable by insurance companies).

New CDC Guidance

Accordingly, CDC has announced a revised rule which becomes effective December 14, 2009, and under which the HPV vaccine will not be required for aliens seeking admission as an immigrant or seeking adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.

In providing explanation to this change in policy, CDC recognized that genital infection with HPV is an extremely common infection due to its efficient transmission via sexual intercourse. There are approximately 6 million incident infections occurring annually in the United States. Over half of sexually active men and women will develop HPV infection at some point in their lives and 15% of all Americans have current infection with HPV.

Although there are millions of HPV infections annually, it is very difficult to distinguish those cases which resolve from those (about 10,000 per year) cases which result in cervical cancer.  Therefore, while HPV may be an age-appropriate vaccine for an immigrant applicant, HPV neither causes outbreaks nor is it associated with outbreaks (per explanation in the background section).  Further, HPV has not been eliminated, nor is in the process of elimination, in the United States. Therefore, because HPV does not meet the adopted criteria, it will not be a required vaccine for immigrant and adjustment of status to permanent residence applicants.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

As we mentioned in last week’s H-1B visa numbers report, USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past two weeks – as of October 30th and as of November 6th, indicate that there was a notable increase.  As we previously reported, there was an increase of about 6,100 in the number of H-1B petitions, between September 25, 2009 and October 25, 2009.  Similarly, there was an increase of 1,000 between October 25, 2009 and October 30, 2009 and there was an increase of 900 between October 30, 2009, and November 6, 2009.  Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable monthly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will  be reached within 9-10 weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

As a response, USCIS just announced a temporary change in policy pursuant to which it will temporarily accept H-1B petitions filed without Labor Conditions Applications (LCA) that have been certified by the Department of Labor.  USCIS will begin to accept H-1B petitions filed with uncertified LCAs for a 120-day period, commencing November 5, 2009 and through March 4, 2010.  However, USCIS will only accept such H-1B petitions if they are filed at least 7 calendar days after the LCAs were filed with DOL and include evidence of these filings. The only acceptable evidence of filing is a copy of DOL’s email giving notice of receipt of the LCA.

This does not mean that H-1Bs will  be approved without certified LCAs.   USCIS will still require certified LCA to accompany the H-1B petition before it can be approved.   As a result, petitioners who seek to take advantage of this temporary flexibility in the normal filing procedures for H-1B petitions must wait until they receive a request for evidence (RFE) before they submit the DOL-certified LCA to USCIS in support of the H-1B petition. USCIS will give petitioners a period of 30 calendar days within which they must send in a DOL certified LCA in response to the RFE. USCIS will only approve H-1B petitions that include certified LCAs.

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 remain unchanged – EB-2 ROW remains current, EB-2 China remains unchanged at April 1, 2005 and EB-2 India remains at January 22, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW remains unchanged at June 1, 2002, EB-3 China remains unchanged at June 1, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by one week to May 1, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001, except for India which moves forward by one week to May 1, 2001.

U.S. Masters Degrees Quota Reached

As we mentioned in our last H-1B visa numbers report, USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

H-1B Quota Trends

The numbers, as reported over the past two weeks – as of October 25th and as of October 30th, indicate that there was a notable increase.  As we previously reported, there was an increase of about 6,100 in the number of H-1B petitions, between September 25, 2009 and October 25, 2009 (or for the past one month).    Similarly, there was an increase of 1,000 between October 25, 2009 and October 30, 2009.  Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable monthly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.  As a result, if the current trend remains, we estimate that the H-1B quota will  be reached within 10 weeks.

If you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

Additionally, USCIS has received sufficient number of petitions for aliens with advanced degrees and as a result, USCIS has announced that the master’s cap for FY2010 has been met.  As of October 25, 2009, all FY2010 H-1B petitions for holders of U.S. advanced degrees will be counted towards the general cap of 65,000.

The numbers, as of October 25th, indicate that there was a notable increase (of about 6,100) in the number of H-1B petitions, compared to September 25, 2009 (or for the past one month).    Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable monthly increase in the numbers of H-1B filings.

With recent news about the improving health of the U.S. economy and the substantial monthly H-1B visas increase of 6,100, we expect that the H-1B cap will remain open for at least a month or so.  However, if you are considering filing a cap-subject H-1B petition as part of the FY2010 quota, please contact us as soon as possible.

• EB-1 remains current across the board.
• EB-2 China moves forward by a week to April 1, 2005 while EB-2 ROW remains current and EB-2 India remains unchanged at January 22, 2005.
• EB-3 ROW remains unchanged at June 1, 2002, EB-3 China moves forward by three months to June 1, 2002, while EB-3 India moves forward by one week to April 22, 2001.
• Other worker visa numbers remains unchanged at June 1, 2001, except for India which moves forward by one week to April 22, 2001.

The numbers, as of September 25th, indicate that there was a notable increase (of about 700) in the number of H-1B petitions, compared to September 18, 2009 (or for the past one week).    Based on our tracking of the H-1B numbers, this increase shows a notable weekly uptick in the numbers of H-1B filings.  Despite this weekly increase of 700 H-1B petitions, the rate of new H-1B filings is expected to remain steady and the H-1B cap to remain open for some months ahead.